[meteorite-list] End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments
From: Paul H. <oxytropidoceras_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 22:24:05 -0500 Message-ID: <20110504232405.O54JQ.335278.imail_at_eastrmwml45> The below commentary and associated comments contains some interesting comments about the process of peer-review. Ploegh, H., 2011, End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments. Nature. vol. 472, no. 7344, p. 391. http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110427/full/472391a.html?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20110428 http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110427/full/472391a.html ?Peer review of scientific papers in top journals is bogged down by unnecessary demands for extra lab work, argues Hidde Ploegh.? Peer review demands for extra experiments are "wasteful tyranny" - http://scientopia.org/blogs/drugmonkey/2011/04/27/peer-review-demands-for-extra-experiments-are-wasteful-tyranny/ Yours, Paul H. Received on Wed 04 May 2011 11:24:05 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |