[meteorite-list] End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments

From: Paul H. <oxytropidoceras_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 22:24:05 -0500
Message-ID: <20110504232405.O54JQ.335278.imail_at_eastrmwml45>

The below commentary and associated comments contains
some interesting comments about the process of peer-review.

Ploegh, H., 2011, End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer
experiments. Nature. vol. 472, no. 7344, p. 391.
http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110427/full/472391a.html?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20110428
http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110427/full/472391a.html

?Peer review of scientific papers in top journals is bogged
down by unnecessary demands for extra lab work, argues
Hidde Ploegh.?

Peer review demands for extra experiments are "wasteful
tyranny" - http://scientopia.org/blogs/drugmonkey/2011/04/27/peer-review-demands-for-extra-experiments-are-wasteful-tyranny/

Yours,

Paul H.
Received on Wed 04 May 2011 11:24:05 PM PDT


Help support this free mailing list:



StumbleUpon
del.icio.us
reddit
Yahoo MyWeb