[meteorite-list] The Interest In Meteorites
From: Murray Paulson <murray.paulson_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 12:40:18 -0600 Message-ID: <AANLkTikWwbZkMjfeX7jRRe-dh-6non5byxqhxKAWXYwT_at_mail.gmail.com> Hi Bob & list: I will caution you on the possible loss of valuable data on the resampling the photos to too small a size. We have seen as time goes by, the available bandwidth and storage capacity increases, and the 300 x 250 images will be vaguely reminicent of the 320 x 240 videos you skip over on Youtube. We don't need 5 Mb image files, but some happy medium would be nice. Please don't resize the images to a less than useful size. I have looked at 300, 480, 640, 800 and 1024 pixel long dimension images and 640 to 800 are the minimum I would resample things down to. I thank the efforts to put up the EOM and it is a great reference. Murray Paulson On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:13 AM, bcmeteorites <bcmeteorites at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > I will also add that one of the features we built into the EoM is that when an image is > submitted that it automatically is resized to not consume a large amount of band width; if > someone posts an image that has not been resized (many are 5mb and larger) it is reduced to > around 300 x 250 pixels to help with not only size of data base but also to allow picture to > load faster when you select to view full size. > > Glad that everyone is enjoying the EoM and it is with all the images it is becoming a solid > data base for visual reference. > Thanks to everyone for some of their outstanding images they have shared. > > Best Regards, > Bob Falls > IMCA Board of Director #2413 > EoM Administrator > Received on Sat 26 Mar 2011 02:40:18 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |