[meteorite-list] trips to the Moon (Moon bases and meteorite recovery)

From: Martin Altmann <altmann_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:45:25 +0200
Message-ID: <002301cc3578$1ba2e630$52e8b290$_at_de>

Hm Michael,

question - if you haven't any atmosphere, which could slow down the incoming
meteorids,
how many would survive the impact with cosmic velocities, such rocks are
typically travelling with in the inner solar system, to such a degree, that
they would lie there in nice sizes usually called "stones"?
(Hmmm and when I'll drive there around with my car, how could I spot them,
if they haven't any fusion crust or a different color from oxidation...)
And if they survived the impact, how long would they survive without being
crunched, smashed, pulverized by other impacts? A little space weathering we
have there, but else no weathering and no geological activities for 3
billion years - but a permanent bombardment of small and large high velocity
impacts - having hammered the complete lunar surface into a field of debris
and dust.
And if you look at the Apollo rocks or into your lunar meteorites, most of
them witness an extraordinary violent history. Shocked, mixed, full of tiny
fragments of different rocks, glasses, resolified dust...ect.
On the other hand, iiif meteorites would survive all that on Moon,
why then the astronauts didn't stumble every step over a meteorite, if they
had 3 billion years to assemble there and no weathering, making them
decaying?

Would be my questions only (not knowledge).

Martin
 

-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Michael
Gilmer
Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Juni 2011 04:08
An: James Beauchamp
Cc: Edwin Thompson; meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] trips to the Moon (Moon bases and meteorite
recovery)

Sorry for all of my typos - I meant to say :

Well taken, and I agree. Part of their mission was to retrieve lunar
samples, but imagine how many meteorites could be found if a team was
put on to the lunar surface with the primary focus of finding
meteorites and ignoring native lunar materials. :)

I'll stop posting now, I am having typing issues and developing
blabber mouth. LOL


On 6/27/11, Michael Gilmer <meteoritemike at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Well taken, and I agree. Part of their mission was to retrieve lunar
> samples, but how imagine meteorites could be found if a team was put
> on to the lunar surface with the primary focus of finding meteorites
> and ignoring native lunar materials. :)
>
> Maybe Acme H3 Industries, Inc, will have the spare room in their
> underground base to lease out space to a meteorite hunting team, and
> the necessary scientific equipment to use for the mission (modified
> rovers, infrastructure, etc).
>
> Heck, the mining teams might "unearth" (unlune?) buried meteorites
> from under layers of regolith.
>
> Best regards,
>
> MikeG
>
> --
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
> Galactic Stone & Ironworks - Meteorites & Amber (Michael Gilmer)
>
> Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com
> Facebook - http://tinyurl.com/42h79my
> News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
> Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone
> EOM - http://www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com/collection.aspx?id=1564
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
>
>
>
> On 6/27/11, James Beauchamp <falcon99 at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> " The Apollo astronauts were not meteorite hunters, nor did they have any
>> specific mission or training involving meteorites."
>>
>> Mike, I don't think that's quite correct. The Apollo crews were well
>> versed
>> in the expected geology, and were looking for quite a diverse lot of
>> rocks.
>> They spent many months training with geologists. Certainly, Dr. Schmitt
>> was no exception on Apollo 17. "From Earth to the Moon" episode 10 was
>> an
>> excellent, even a bit romanticized focus on the geology focus.
>> I think the focus was (and should have been) more anti-meteorite. We had
>> plenty of those. But we didn't have verified lunar samples - to include
>> cores and other different types. We needed more of those to verify the
>> origins of our companion, and very little time and resources on-hand to
>> get
>> them.
>> Just my thoughts on the matter. Obviously, I fully admit I should stay
>> in
>> my engineering corner, but couldn't help poking a little. :)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --- On Mon, 6/27/11, Michael Gilmer <meteoritemike at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Michael Gilmer <meteoritemike at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] trips to the Moon (Moon bases and meteorite
>> recovery)
>> To: "Edwin Thompson" <etmeteorites at hotmail.com>
>> Cc: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> Date: Monday, June 27, 2011, 7:43 PM
>>
>> Hi Edwin, Sterling, and List,
>>
>> I love a good science-fiction, science-fact, trip into speculation
>> land. It reminds me of the old pulp sci-fi novels from the 50's and
>> 60's that I have read, with rocketships and moon bases.
>>
>> Cosmic rays are not the only threat, there are also micro-meteorites
>> and meteorites. The Late Heavy Bombardment is long over, but there is
>> still a lot of debris peppering the Earth and Moon on a regular basis.
>> With no atmosphere, the lunar surface is basically naked to incoming
>> impactors. A base facility on the lunar surface would be subject to
>> high-velocity impacts on a random basis.
>>
>> Now we can all imagine how the lunar surface is probably littered with
>> plentiful meteorites. The Apollo astronauts were not meteorite
>> hunters, nor did they have any specific mission or training involving
>> meteorites. The first meteorite recovery team to be stationed on the
>> Moon would be the very first people to hunt the surface - the opposite
>> of being "hunted out". The problem is the lethal environment
>> involved. It would be a death-trap full of meteorites if not handled
>> properly. The Apollo astronauts could not stay out for the extended
>> periods necessary to walk a grid or do a meaningful amount of
>> searching for suspect rocks. Although we have made some advancements
>> since then, the lunar surface is still the most hostile, alien, and
>> lethal environment that an Earthly meteorite hunter could imagine.
>> Our modern day meteornauts on the Moon would have to rely on radar,
>> remote rovers, and man-operated rovers.
>>
>> To have any permanent presence on the Moon, the surface would need a
>> warning system for incoming impactors. We can assume an early-warning
>> detection system, partially automated, that consists of satellites and
>> surface-based radars, telescopes, and other sensors. This warning
>> system would detect potential impactors that are large enough to
>> damage facilities or personnel. So, we could have a lunar rover that
>> could carry a small team of 2 individuals over a long distance with a
>> meaningful duration (say, several hours, or even "overnight" in some
>> cases.). These individuals would be dispatched to retrieve
>> large/heavy meteorites that smaller unmanned rovers could not pick up.
>> They could safely travel the surface (relatively speaking) and they
>> could be warned to evade/avoid a potentially deadly strike by the
>> warning system. They would still have to worry about the rare fluke
>> micro-meteorite or one that slips through the detection system, but it
>> would be slightly better odds than a crap-shoot.
>>
>> The bulk of the searching and retrieval would be accomplished by
>> robust remote-operately rovers. These would be larger than the
>> current Mars rovers we know so well (thanks for the always reliable
>> updates Mr. Baalke!), but small enough to be produced on a low to
>> modest budget. Essentially it would be a "wander and grab" rover with
>> a sophisticated optical system than can scan the lunar surface in high
>> resolution and provide a "first person" view to the rover operator who
>> is located miles away in an underground facility. It's main
>> attributes would be quickness (to cover larger amounts of real estate
>> in a much shorter time span than today's rovers), keen eyes (cameras),
>> and economy of travel (able to stay afield for extended periods of
>> time).
>>
>> The rover would also have a robotic arm and a collection bin than can
>> be hermetically sealed. The operator would use the rover to locate
>> and retrieve all meteorites within the operating range of the rover.
>> Those meteorites which are too large, too heavy, or too numerous for
>> the rover to recover, would be assigned to a manned rover mission to
>> recover the specimens.
>>
>> I don't think there would be a lunar base built just to retrieve
>> meteorites. However, one can envision a scientific base that is an
>> all-purpose facility to house a number of teams that are based there
>> for extended periods of time and are rotated in and out. Astronomers,
>> chemists, physicists, geologists....the potential uses for a lunar
>> surface facility would be many and varied, and meteorites could be one
>> of those missions.
>>
>> Instead of ANSMET, we could have MOONMET - now who is going to apply
>> for the first expedition?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> MikeG
>>
>> --
>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
>> Galactic Stone & Ironworks - Meteorites & Amber (Michael Gilmer)
>>
>> Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com
>> Facebook - http://tinyurl.com/42h79my
>> News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
>> Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone
>> EOM - http://www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com/collection.aspx?id=1564
>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/27/11, Edwin Thompson <etmeteorites at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> http://www.space.com/1111-private-moon-trips-forecast.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear fellow listers, for only 100 million dollars you can go to the moon
>>> and
>>> gather your own Lunar specimens. It could be a very profitable
>>> enterprise.
>>> But the rumor mill has it that China will be going to the Moon next. If
>>> you
>>> go there be sure to dodge those nasty cosmic rays.
>>>
>>> There is a society of brainiacs that has designed a substantial Moon
>>> base.
>>> Sadly that facility must be built beneath the Lunar surface in a
>>> volcanic
>>> cavern to shield the inhabitants from cosmic ray exposure.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers, E.T.
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> Visit the Archives at
>>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> Visit the Archives at
>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>
>

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Galactic Stone & Ironworks - Meteorites & Amber (Michael Gilmer)
Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook - http://tinyurl.com/42h79my
News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone
EOM - http://www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com/collection.aspx?id=1564
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Received on Tue 28 Jun 2011 05:45:25 AM PDT