[meteorite-list] NASA could sell...

From: Sterling K. Webb <sterling_k_webb_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:42:42 -0500
Message-ID: <86845DE0AE4847F5AB23EBCD52752239_at_ATARIENGINE2>

Mark, List,

Go Get Your Own Moon Rocks!

What? You say you can't afford a small intra-planetary
vehicle, a little robot to go to the Moon and collect a few
kilos of Moon Rocks for you?

No problemo.

Then what you need is is to buy a share of a private
space company's Lunar Return Mission, right? Like:
http://www.interorbital.com/Lunar%20Sample%20Return_1.htm

All that is needed to secure a share of returned lunar
material is a 10% deposit (against a $7500/gm cost).

You say all you want is to put a micro-satellite into low
Earth orbit, you say? They have a satellite kit (with
launch included) for only $8,000:
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/07/tubesat-personal-satellite/
You even get a free second launch if the first one fails.

More about them:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interorbital_Systems
"IOS holds an active Office of Commercial Space
Transportation Launch License... is currently working
on a line of launch vehicles aimed at winning the Google
Lunar X Prize. The company was also a competitor for
both the Ansari X-Prize and America's Space Prize..."


Sterling K. Webb
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: All email purchase advice is worth no more
than the electrons used to send the emil, and my liability
is limited to the cost of said electrons, which I would refund
by mailing you a small, used button battery.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Ford" <mark.ford at ssl.gb.com>
To: <Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 9:23 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NASA could sell...



Personally I completely disagree with the cost estimate of 5-8 billion,
a simple small robotic sample mission really ought to be not too
difficult (Russia did Lunar sample return on a total shoestring in the
60's). I would send a simple, small lander, grab some rocks in a scoop
then take off and return. (Turning the mission into a full rover
prospecting mission is bound to increase the cost drastically!)

 The stardust mission for example cost around $200 Million (that was a
sample return all be it a space capture). A lunar sample return would be
much cheaper than a Martian one obviously, but small mars rocket motor
designs and a return module have already been studied in several
different NASA/ESA feasibility proposals, and I would be surprised if
they cost anything like 5 Billion, I rekon it could be done for less
than $500 Million, if it was a simple small grab and return system.

 I'd also do it using a cheaper and more fuel efficient return method
than traditionally, such as Ion engine technology, it would take much
longer but would require much less of a fuel payload than a conventional
return to earth would, then I would advocate using the ISS as a capture
and return lab, rather than risking a traditional re-entry, this would
save money too, as you wouldn't be returning a complete re-entry vehicle
back from mars!

I think you would easily sell a few kilos of Apollo moon rock with no
trouble at all, there are enough rich billionaires (probably they would
not even be meteorite collectors) out there who would snap it up, it
would be a truly unique opportunity this would attract plenty of
speculators -it would be a different market than meteorite samples.

Besides plenty of people would buy microscopic amounts (put me down for
an Apollo 11 super-micro any time!!).

Best,
Mark







-----Original Message-----
From: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Martin
Altmann
Sent: 27 June 2011 13:13
To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NASA could sell...

Hi Mark,

>I estimate we probably could fund an automatic sample return mission to
both mars [and] to the moon, just for >the 'cost' of a few off cut
Apollo
lunar chunks..

Well the cost estimation of an automatic Mars sample return mission,
then a
cooperation between NASA & ESA - a rover probing different Martian rocks
on
surface - and where 500grams shall be expedited back to Earth - is
estimated
in the 5-8 billion $ range.

Makes up a gram price, if you want to cover it with the sale of half of
the
Apollo rocks, of something around 35k$.
(But who shall buy that stuff? - after 13 years STILL not all of DaG 400
is
sold, and that at current prices around 1k$/g - and that stone had only
1.4kg...).

Hmm, my last mail didn't made it through.

Best!
Martin

-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Mark
Ford
Gesendet: Montag, 27. Juni 2011 13:41
An: Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] NASA could sell...


I certainly don't think NASA should sell all the moon rock, but I don't
see
any harm in selling off a few very carefully selected waste pieces
(currently they even count back and store all the waste dust from
cutting
losses!), there must be a large amount of material that is contaminated
by
the terrestrial environment by processing/handling etc, that has no
special
value to science (it's useless). Especially if this money was genuinely
used
to further space research (naively assuming it really was used for
this!),
it could actually be used to fund a lot more space/lunar research!

I estimate we probably could fund an automatic sample return mission to
both
mars [and] to the moon, just for the 'cost' of a few off cut Apollo
lunar
chunks..



Mark




-----Original Message-----
From: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Martin
Altmann
Sent: 27 June 2011 08:59
To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NASA could sell...

To sell the Apollo rocks? Have you taken leave of your senses?!?

Those rocks, which the heroes of my youth brought back, risking their
lives,
and in the greatest technical adventure of all times??

You're all watching too much TV! Too much science fiction!

We can't go around in the solar system in that way you're taking a cab!
Manned spaceflight is extremely difficult and extremely dangerous.

Look what we can do. At the moment we have an assemblage of tin cans in
such
a low orbit, a kind of water ski in spaceflight, in a so low orbit, that
the
grandmas call the police, whenever the ISS cross over their heads!
And more we cannot!

Now we are all trembling, that the little box called "Dawn" will not
fail
and send us some data from the front garden of our tiny solar system.

Lunar materials, think to the millions of man-hours spent in the
deserts, to
assemble the tiny pile of lunar meteorites, so small and light-weighted,
that everyone of us can lift it without difficulties.
(And think about that, whenever your nose starts to wrinkle, when such a
specimen offered is lousy 100 bucks more expensive per gram than you
expected.)

And although I feel still quite healthy, I won't live to see a man or
woman
on Moon again (not to mention Mars).

Really.
Rather sell the Brooklyn Bridge.

And which meteorites shall NASA sell?
Those from ANSMET?
That isn't possible because the Antarctic Treaty prevents that,

and hey - we're all buyers and sellers of meteorites, so we definitely
know,
that the revenues would be out of absolutely all proportion to the
expenses
paid to collect these meteorites.
And thus, it would be even probably elements of offence, a
misappropriation.

Huh, we're just selling a brachinite, the freshest available, where in
36
years of Antarctic searches by all countries together not more than 3
different were found, together half a pound.
And we are selling that one in slices and not in bulk - and at a total,
wherefore you can pay having an ANSMET-Team exactly one single day on
the
ice!
These are the relations.

It is absolutely necessary, that the ANSMET meteorites stay in the
courtesy
of governmental institutes and universities - their acquisition was
expensive enough! (No offense, in my eyes these costs are fully
justified).
To sell them on the market would bring in peanuts compared to that, what
the
taxpayer had spent for them.

And Richard, who says, that NASA wouldn't buy meteorites?
Nasa consists of hundreds of departments - of course if you address to
the
janitor, he won't buy a meteorite.
But those exploring the solar system do, of course.

And the abnormal opinion of people, pretending to be scientists
interested
in meteorites,
that a Moon or a chondrite is per se a crime,
that you found at best in countries with an underdeveloped meteorite
research like e.g. Australia or Oman,
but certainly not in USA.

;-)
Martin






______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Mon 27 Jun 2011 04:42:42 PM PDT