[meteorite-list] NASA sues Moonwalker Astronaut

From: Martin Altmann <altmann_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 15:17:37 +0200
Message-ID: <008f01cc3a4c$bea40ed0$3bec2c70$_at_de>

Indeed it is not so much a legal question, it is a question of decency.

Seems that a new generation was bred by NASA.
How disrespectful and ungrateful can you still be for that by all means truly heroic deeds the astronauts did for NASA and the nation, to molest them now at their old-age with such a petty and greedy idiocy!

I think, it's a question of reason and saving the face of that governmental spaceflight organization to remove these shameless rugrats, who had that brilliant idea, immediately from their jobs.

NASA was scrooge enough to them with their Moon rocks.

Meteorite people are different...
Look, here Mitchell receives a piece of Moon via Tim Heitz:
http://www.meteorman.org/Ed-Mitchell.htm


Best,
Martin



-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com [mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von MexicoDoug
Gesendet: Montag, 4. Juli 2011 09:31
An: Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
Betreff: [meteorite-list] NASA sues Moonwalker Astronaut

http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/90053154?U.S.%20government%20sues%20former%20astronaut%20over%20lunar%20camera#ixzz1R7PMDp3p

Dear list,

This is a very relevant case to meteorites and should not be taken
lightly.

They're at it again ... rewriting history and after 40 years of NASA's
permission to take mementos from the Apollo era - now suing the sixth
man to walk on the moon, Edgar Mitchell of Apollo 11, for trying to
sell the camera they allowed him to have ... the precedent, I suspect
is the identical one to the dust on the tape, which didn't exist, but
they are gunning for now.

Again, we are faced with the erosion of sensible property rights, a
violation of traditional English and Roman law regarding the importance
of possession IMO, in an effort to legislation effort from the bench at
its finest (sarcasm). The question at hand: Can we apply today's
standards retroactively to say NASA was wrong to allow astronauts to
have things that were of no use to NASA at the time and with the full
knowledge of NASA allowed to be kept by those involved. After 40 years
of knowledge that the astronaut possessed this camera and other sundry
things, it becomes a precedent, and NASA is even painting an American
hero with a scarlet letter of "T" for "Thief"....

>From the article:

"During the Apollo mission era, Mitchell said he and other astronauts
got permission to take mementos from the spacecrafts. "We have dozens
of pieces. All of us who flew to the moon," he said in a Palm Beach
Post report.

Mitchell?s lawyer, Donald Jacobson, said, "Objects from the lunar trips
to the moon were ultimately mounted and then presented to the
astronauts as a gift after they had helped NASA on a mission."

The government is asking the court to order Mitchell to hand over the
camera, and declare that it has "good, clean and exclusive title" to
the piece of space history.


Best wishes
Doug
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Mon 04 Jul 2011 09:17:37 AM PDT