[meteorite-list] Looking to Buy. Trying to "complete" my typeset. THERE IS A NEW CHONDRITE TYPE....
From: Stuart McDaniel <actionshooting_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:31:44 -0500 Message-ID: <D5AE68F31D174FA7BA4548444B0DCE51_at_StuartMcDaniel> I too am a type collector but like Richard sais, I cannot afford to collect all the little "nuances" types. I just try to get one of each type group, i.e. IA, IB, IIA,IIB, and each one of the achondrites but not all the 3.8, 3.9, etc. Basically one of each "headings" you have listed. Stuart McDaniel Lawndale, NC Secr., Cleve. Co. Astronomical Society -----Original Message----- From: Richard Kowalski Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 8:07 PM To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Looking to Buy. Trying to "complete" my typeset. THERE IS A NEW CHONDRITE TYPE.... --- On Mon, 2/14/11, Galactic Stone <meteoritemike at gmail.com> wrote: > The intrepid type collector, forever > at the mercy of nomenclature. > What was once CV4 is now CK4. Over time, the type > collection > continues to grow and grow. Hey Mike. Well yes, and no. > > According to David Weir's Meteorite Studies website, here > is a > condensed breakdown of the known types - That is the expanded basis of my type set. When you pointed out a number of additions I was missing, I added those to my list and obtained more specimens. A type collector can go nuts typing to pursue every single subdivision of any "set", but that's the same thing any collector has to deal with, no? On the other hand a collector could obtain a stone, an iron and a mesosiderite and consider his type set complete. Most of us are somewhere in between. Realistically I can't chase the rarest of the rare sub-groups. There just isn't enough material available nor is my budget very large. I have to pick and choose what "complete" means for me and sometimes a few milligrams is all I have or can afford of the type. However this is enough to fill the hole in the set. I've had a number of people offer specimens that would fill some of my needed types, but is sizes that are out of my budget. Sometimes nearly complete is the best one can do... One obvious thing that becomes apparent as the list expands is some types are just not available. Those are listed on my master sheet as such, but don't appear as "needed". If any of the unavailable types falls and becomes available to the collector market, then the type would be come "needed". The same goes for the rare sub-types, but for now I don't feel the need to include them. Finally as collecting tastes change, the desire to maintain the type collection as complete as possible often wanes in the collector as new avenues of knowledge are opened. Just some of my thoughts on collecting (not just meteorites) which I have acquired over the past few decades. I'm sure everyone else does things their own way... Cheers -- Richard Kowalski Full Moon Photography IMCA #1081 ____________________________________________________________________________________ Don't pick lemons. See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos. http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-listReceived on Mon 14 Feb 2011 08:31:44 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |