[meteorite-list] Meteorwrongs and Meteorites
From: Jim Wooddell <jimwooddell_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:16:39 -0700 Message-ID: <BANLkTimjzO3YEsXjG8NPCGP94Yi=Ow16jg_at_mail.gmail.com> Hi Adam and Carl! Are you a private institution or publicly funded? Jim On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Adam Hupe <raremeteorites at yahoo.com> wrote: > I could not agree more. People often forget that there is considerable costs > involved in characterizing real meteorites and for some reason they expect this > service for free. ?Meteorite-wrongs tie up a lot of resources and are a drag on > the few laboratories that are qualified to study real meteorites. I do not think > there is a laboratory left in Arizona that will still take "meteorites" from the > general public for study. ?This is due to the increase in meteorite-wrongs that > waste every bodies time. If this increase in meteorite-wrongs continues, expect > a lot more laboratories to be off-limits. > > Researchers valuable time is better spent on real meteorites rather then telling > somebody they are not the latest millionaire. > > Best Regards, > > Adam > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Carl Agee <agee at unm.edu> > To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > Sent: Thu, April 21, 2011 9:41:59 AM > Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteorwrongs and Meteorites > > My take on this is the following. Most people who come to us with a > suspect meteorite are for some reason expecting that identification > costs us nothing, and that we can glance at sample and give quick > answer. So when they go to an average geology department and get a > "free" meteorite screening they may often get what they pay for -- > someone's best guess -- often of dubious merit. Of course there are > many samples that are so obviously meteorwrongs that a quick glance is > all that is needed. But - I would never tell someone they have an iron > meteorite before I had at least run an EDS analysis on it for Fe and > Ni. And that's just the start -- if you want to know what kind of an > iron -- well that's a lot more work still! ?But of course not everyone > has an SEM in their basement. And guess what? These instruments cost > money, and the technicians who keep them running are paid salaries. As > for stones, yes, I can tell you fairly quickly, running a calibrated > electron microprobe, if your sample is a eucrite, ureilite, lunar, > martian -- or a just terrestrial basalt. So this is the dilemma that > we often face: definitive answers usually take time, money, and > expertise -- there is no free lunch for good data. > > -- > Carl B. Agee > Director and Curator, Institute of Meteoritics > Professor, Earth and Planetary Sciences > MSC03 2050 > University of New Mexico > Albuquerque NM 87131-1126 > > Tel: (505) 750-7172 > Fax: (505) 277-3577 > Email: agee at unm.edu > http://epswww.unm.edu/iom/pers/agee.html > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > Received on Thu 21 Apr 2011 05:16:39 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |