[meteorite-list] NYT Story

From: Rob Holcomb <rob.holcomb_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 22:17:50 -0700
Message-ID: <198238F149B64757953738A569CD8826_at_ATTHEFARM>

There is a dry and to the point Wikipedia article about Mr. Broad,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Broad. He has covered many technical
and scientific events in his career, including continuing coverage of the
Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant event going on in Japan; the meteorite story
wasn't among his finest, and it certainly isn't be his worst.

I'd really like to hear a response from him on the list, but that's probably
unlikely.
/rh

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Darryl Pitt" <darryl at dof3.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 9:03 PM
To: "Adam Hupe" <raremeteorites at yahoo.com>
Cc: "Adam" <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NYT Story

>
> Hi....
>
>> Why would the NYT even use quote marks if what they print is inaccurate?
>> I can see them taking these responses out of context but changing what
>> somebody
>> said and placing quote marks around it is nothing short of liable.
>
>
> While I agree with some of what you've written, the aforementioned is
> factually inaccurate. What you're referring to has nothing in and of
> itself to do with libel. Zilch.
>
> For those who are interested, The New York Times Manual of Style will
> explain all stylistic choices employed by the paper
>
> While the writer of the piece obviously did a hack job, it should be noted
> he won the Pulitzer Prize, twice, and is considered by many to a dean of
> science writers.
>
> Overseas list members, if you have the opportunity, please peruse the
> International Herald Tribune to see if they picked up the story and run it
> in its entirety.
>
> Thanks and all the best / d,
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 6, 2011, at 10:30 PM, Adam Hupe wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> It seems some disagree with this statement I made earlier.
>>
>>
>> <I have a hard time believing that any form of media would liable
>> themselves by
>> putting quotes
>>
>> around something that was completely made up.>
>>
>> I am not defending the NYT and think the article is poor.
>>
>> It used to be when quote marks were printed that this was the exact
>> statement
>> made. Why would the NYT even use quote marks if what they print is
>> inaccurate?
>> I can see them taking these responses out of context but changing what
>> somebody
>> said and placing quote marks around it is nothing short of liable.
>>
>>
>> If this reporter knows nothing about meteorites and was a blank slat
>> start with,
>> then somebody had to put these thoughts into his head. It looks to me
>> that Dr.
>> Harvey might have set the tone for this article. Perhaps, he was quoted
>> out of
>> context but if so, it his responsibility to clarify it since he granted
>> them the
>> interview. If you want to be in the limelight, then you have to take
>> responsibility for any negative fallout. After all, he was acting as a
>> spokesperson for the rest of us by granting this public interview.
>>
>>
>> Everybody else quoted in this article has stepped up to the plate, took
>> responsibility for what was said and explained what they meant to say. I
>> applaud this action and believe most mentioned in this article were
>> completely
>> caught off guard.
>>
>> I do not cherish the thought of somebody else speaking on my behalf
>> publicly,
>> especially when they were not elected to do so. What is printed or
>> plastered on
>> TV affects all of us. Remember this when an interview with the media
>> seems to
>> be getting out of hand. You can always stop the interview and move on.
>> Most
>> media outlets thrive on negative entertainment and it works. One just has
>> to
>> look at the negative political campaigns to see this. If it did not
>> work, then
>> politicians would not use this tactic. It takes ten positive articles to
>> offset
>> one negative one.
>>
>>
>> This ratings over responsibility attitude can be devastating. Just ask
>> any
>> former treasure hunter.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Adam
>> ______________________________________________
>> Visit the Archives at
>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
Received on Thu 07 Apr 2011 01:17:50 AM PDT