[meteorite-list] Re : nwa 5400 pairing to nwa 5363

From: habibi abdelaziz <azizhabibi_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <980975.92537.qm_at_web62001.mail.re1.yahoo.com>

thanks norbert for your habitual honnesty and help
you have been a good help for me? for years now , and we if are going to miss
you at the imca we hope we will not miss in the meteorite community.
i have no doubt on what you said ,
i transfer this email and cc to albert jambon.

thanks
aziz

---- Norbert Classen <riffraff at timewarp.de> wrote:
> Dear Aziz & All,
>
> You wrote:
>
> > he said too that he has given all the data that confirm
> > the pairing including the isotope to norbert classen in
> > end june where they talk abaout this and as i asked him
> > to do so.
>
> Maybe there's a slight misunderstanding here. I actually emailed with Dr.
> Jambon in June, and we also intended to meet at the Ste. Marie Show at the
> end of June where Dr. Jambon wanted to show me all the data (including the
> O-isotope data). However, unfortunatelly we missed each other at the show,
> and so the meeting didn't take place.
>
> Don't get me wrong, I have no reason to doubt Dr. Jambon's word on this - I
> just wanted to get the facts straight. Maybe you misunderstood Dr. Jambon?
> But up to this day I haven't seen the O-isotope data for NWA 5363. All I
> have seen is a writeup on NWA 5363 which didn't include the O-isotope data.
>
> Again, that doesn't mean much, and I'm also looking forward to the official
> publication of NWA 5363. This will hopefully answer all the questions.
>
> We all need to remember that meteorite classification (including the voting
> process on new meteorites at the NomCom of the Meteoritical Society) takes
> time. So we as collectors should, IMHO, be patient, and wait with
> conclusions until the scientific work has been done and published.
>
> All the best,
> Norbert
>
> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
>
> hi all
> and i m happy that this issue is becoming a very polit and civilised
> discussion;
>
> well 3 months that i do not want to get caught inside this discussion any
> more, but well this is becoming repeated to a point that we forget what the
> debat is about,
>
> for nwa 5363;
>
> i get a talk on albert jambon mobile ,
> i asked him that many dealers or collectors still think that nwa 5400 is not
> paired to nwa 5363 and he answered me this.
>
> he said that he have submited to the nomcom all the information, and he
> coudln't have said that they are paired if he haven't done isotope
>
> so clearly he ?indicate that he has done isotope and have submited them to
> the nomcom dr wisberg or so , its on the phone.
> and? he said he is surprised why the nomcom didn't pubilsh them yet,
>
> he said too that he has given all the data that confirm the pairing
> including the isotope to norbert classen in end june where they talk abaout
> this and as i asked him to do so.
>
> so i ask here
> do we have?any ?guy from the nomcom here , please end this torture and tell
> us if you have this data or not,and why you didn't publish them.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> thanks
>
> aziz habibi
>
>
>? ? ?
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at
>http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


      
Received on Wed 29 Sep 2010 07:46:45 PM PDT