[meteorite-list] OT: Listening To Fermi
From: Meteorites USA <eric_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 20:12:34 -0700 Message-ID: <4C92DCA2.4060901_at_meteoritesusa.com> Sorry this sentence should read: The child could be looking out the [right] window at the wrong time. The horse could have been there and gone. Or the child could be looking out the wrong window at the wrong time. Big difference. On 9/16/2010 8:04 PM, Meteorites USA wrote: > Valid points Phil... My answer to your question. As many years as it > takes... Just like meteorite hunting, you have to look where they are, > and even if you're looking in the right place, you still might not > find them. ;) (interestingly enough, I think everyone here on-list can > relate to that) > > Time scale though arguably the most important factor, is not the only > factor. You must consider the technical limitations of Radio, and the > distance such a transmission would be capable of traveling. It also > depends on the direction in which you listen, as well as "when" you > are listening. Putting things into a more simplistic perspective... > > The child could be looking out the window at the wrong time. The horse > could have been there and gone. Or the child could be looking out the > wrong window at the wrong time. Or the maybe there are no horses in > the child's neighborhood. Or the child may see the horse, and not know > it's a horse. > > Also to your point, (paraphrasing)"'...if they're out there surely we > would have heard them..." Is simply a rewording of Fermi's question. > > Fermi's original question "Where are they?" is assumptive and based on > incomplete data. The point being, there is no possible "correct" > conclusion that can be formed either way at this time, because we > didn't have and still haven't enough data to form the original > question in the first place. > > However, that is not to say that we (humans) aren't trying. > > Regards, > Eric > > > On 9/16/2010 7:16 PM, JoshuaTreeMuseum wrote: >> Interesting point Eric. My question is: how many years of complete >> and total silence would it take to reach the conclusion there's just >> nobody out there? 1,000? 10,000? a million years? a billion? a >> googlezillion? You could listen for eternity, hear nothing and say, >> well we just need a little more time. I don't buy the argument of >> time scale. If there are aliens out there transmitting at anywhere >> near the rate of Earth's output, surely in 50 years we would have >> heard one little bit of Morse Code by now. >> >> ------------------------------------------------ >> Phil Whitmer >> >> >> >> I might agree with that sentiment if there were enough information to >> support it. However, I've got an interesting question about perspective >> and time. >> >> If a child looked out the window of a house for a mere 32/1000th of a >> second and formed a conclusion that horses do not exist, would you say >> he's correct? >> >> Eric >> ______________________________________________ >> Visit the Archives at >> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >> > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > Received on Thu 16 Sep 2010 11:12:34 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |