[meteorite-list] Mars Odyssey THEMIS Images: ET? - NOT!!

From: James Balister <balisterjames_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 14:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <306203.86890.qm_at_web180102.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>

Remember that research was 10 years ago!? But yes I have also used the new higher res pics.? I found about 100 on that.? Also remember what I said, that some will be able to see them and some will not!? But none the less they are there!?? There are pictures composed of dots etc ( I forgot the name for it)? That work the same way.? You look at it and see nothing then suddenly a bird pops into view!? The trick there is to put the pic close to your nose then back off.? Why don't you try that with my pics?? Step back and you might see them!? And since they are up close already that might be the best approach.?


----- Original Message ----
> From: Elizabeth Warner <ewarner at umd.edu>
> To: "meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com" <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Sat, May 22, 2010 3:14:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Mars Odyssey THEMIS Images: ET? - NOT!!
>
> Because you are using low res images from the Viking Mission!! Have you gone
> back and looked at the Mars images taken by the myriad new/current missions that
> have much higher resolution??

And I did look at the pictures but saw
> nothing, absolutely nothing of what you described.

Again, it is extremely
> easy to misinterpret shadows, particularly when you are zooming in on a low res,
> grainy image. The human mind likes patterns and will find patterns. And no
> matter how well you train your mind, you will be susceptible to optical
> illusions.
http://www.moillusions.com/? (the last video on the page,
> Wow!)
http://www.michaelbach.de/ot/

For example, you interpret deep
> shadows as being entryways, etc. But, those Viking pics didn't exactly have the
> greatest dynamic range. They're just shadows from boulders.

Look, it
> would be uber cool to see? incontrovertible proof, but the examples you
> provide don't even come close. If you are going to insist that there are
> buildings on Mars, you should at least catch up on the times and use the most
> recent images!

Clear Skies!
Elizabeth

James Balister
> wrote:
> Mike, good idea!? But this posting is not about the
> book.? It is about the Mars structures.? They are real!? But no
> one, even here with inteligent higher then most places seems to care.? No
> one even made mention of the pictures.? They can only dwell on the
> book.? Are they scared to face the fact that there are buildings on
> Mars?? Or is every one blind to it?? Reminds me of the three
> monkeys.? One had his eyes covered, one his mouth, and one his ears.?
> Like in the movie The Planet of the Apes.?
>
>
> -----
> Original Message ----
>> From: Michael Fowler <> ymailto="mailto:mqfowler at mac.com"
> href="mailto:mqfowler at mac.com">mqfowler at mac.com>
>> To: > ymailto="mailto:meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com"
> href="mailto:meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com">meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>
> Cc: Michael Fowler <> href="mailto:mqfowler at mac.com">mqfowler at mac.com>
>> Sent: Sat,
> May 22, 2010 11:26:28 AM
>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Mars Odyssey
> THEMIS Images: ET?
>>
>>> I forgot to mention----Someone
> thought that 19 bucks was too high for a
>> fiction book.? They
> sell for 25 bucks on average.? And we all know what meteorite books
> run!? I bought a book last year that ran me 100 bucks!? So I think 19
> is not too bad for a book!
>
>> From: James Balister
> <balisterjames at > href="http://att.net">> href="http://att.net">att.net
>
>
> James,
>
>
> $19 may seem
>> reasonable to you, but your sales figures
> speak volumes.? Apparently no one wants to gamble $19 on an unknown author
> who can't spell.
>
> Maybe you
>> should lower the price
> to stimulate demand.? If you lower it enough, maybe people will take a
> chance.? Wouldn't you rather have 5,000 sales at $2.00 a copy instead of
> none at $19 bucks a copy?
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Mike
>
>> Fowler
> Chicago
>
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the
>>
> Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>
> Meteorite-list
>> mailing list
>> href="mailto:> ymailto="mailto:Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com"
> href="mailto:Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com">Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com">> ymailto="mailto:Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com"
> href="mailto:Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com">Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at > href="http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html" target=_blank
> >http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> > ymailto="mailto:Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com"
> href="mailto:Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com">Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>
> > >http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at > href="http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html" target=_blank
> >http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list
> mailing list
> href="mailto:Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com">Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> href="http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list" target=_blank
> >http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Sat 22 May 2010 05:42:50 PM PDT