[meteorite-list] FW: Rocks from Space Picture of the Day -May 8, 2010
From: cdtucson at cox.net <cdtucson_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 12:35:13 -0400 Message-ID: <20100509123513.UEJJH.313213.imail_at_fed1rmwml33> Larry, Rob, Wow, I agree . this has been interesting. I did not know the circumstances of these little irons. With Rob's usual excellent explanation it is easy to see why you hunt these little treasures. It also seems likely that whatever else is within the stony variety of this fall may also be found separated as these irons have been. Having said that I think most would now agree that most of your pictured irons are just that. The one in question looks nothing like others though. It even has a coppery color similar to a Levis rivet ( correct size scale too) used at key stress points on jeans. They are not only attracted to a magnet but also contain nickel. So, your SEM will need to keep this in mind. Again, Thank you for this thread. It has been informative.. Carl -- Carl or Debbie Esparza Meteoritemax ---- thetoprok at aol.com wrote: > Hi Rob, List, > > I'd like to address a couple of points Rob made. I have great repect > for you Rob, you are one smart dude, no doubts here! > > No disrespect intended to anyone out there, we all have opinions and > that's what makes it all so fun! (Sorry to Phil and Warren for my > "full of it" comment last night, I was having fun at your expense and > should not have > made the comment, nothing personal.) > > First, I don't believe anyone here thinks of the Franconia irons as an > independent fall. It is widely known and understood that these are > spalled out of the H chondrite. If my memory serves me correctly there > were a few of you real smart guys out there that were adament opponents > of a meteoritic origin at all concerning these tiny irons. A bunch of > us that were in the field finding these little oriented beauties > couldn't understand this position and I was truly starting to doubt > some of the science/scientists. I'm glad it was straightened out and > the truth acknowledged. I don't know if I agree with them getting their > own classification but something needed to be done to acknowledge the > unusual circumstances and unlikely event that created these. That being > said, let's look closely at the irons, they may tell the whole story if > we > can learn to read them. > > Rob says they didn't have the opportunity to experience "high altitude, > high velocity ablation." I've posted some more pictures to my > photobucket site. Though they are not the best pic's they do > demonstrate the fact that at least some of these experienced some > serious ablation, from flow lines to roll over lipping, bullet shapes > and BB's. That in my > opinion constitutes high altitude, high velocity ablation. These shapes > did not occur some time after the stone was on the ground and the metal > weathered out, nor did the shapes occur during dark flight, no way no > how. > > As far as weathering away over the long period of time since the fall, > I have no answer for that. However, it is a fact that many of the irons > that have been found are smaller than .1 gram. I've found them myself > and I've looked at other peoples finds that are very tiny. Somehow they > are not weathering into oblivion. Perhaps this is another aspect of > these irons that is not yet understood. Some are more weathered than > others. They range in color from gun barrel blue to orange rust, some > are black, others are brown, with different degrees of weathering > apparent. > > I believe it's important to know the true answer because if it is a > meteorite it should shed light on the impact pits on Sikhote Alin and > other irons. Some people think that impurities popped out of the iron, > or in the case of Franconia, that chondrules popped out, while others > see a splash as if something impacted it. My little enigma may answer > that question if it is proven to be of extraterrestrial origin. That > would be a contribution to the science. > > If the RFSPOD object is a meteorite I think it is imperative that that > be known. I feel an obligation to put it to the test and I'm close to > having a SEM reading. I'll certainly inform the list when the results > come in. > > Whatever the result is this has been a positive thread that inspires > people to think and have constructive conversation and debate, what > else could you ask for? > > http://s934.photobucket.com/albums/ad190/alienrockfarm/ > > Best Regards to All > Larry > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Matson <mojave_meteorites at cox.net> > To: meteorite-list <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> > Sent: Sun, May 9, 2010 3:19 am > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] FW: Rocks from Space Picture of the Day > -May 8, 2010 > > Hi All, > > Short opinion: manmade. > > Reasoning: the inability to produce such a form purely through > atmospheric ablation. Just to remind everyone, all of the > so-called Franconia irons are nothing more than chondritic > iron that has separated from an H-chondrite fall -- either > during flight, or by terrestrial weathering processes on the > ground. Thus it has always bothered me that these irons were > given a separate meteorite name from the ubiquitous H-chondrites > at Franconia from which they derive. If my information is > outdated on this subject, someone please let me know. But many > (most?) of the people I know who have hunted Franconia and > found these irons do not pretend that they are from a separate > iron fall -- they all accept that the iron nuggets were > spalled from an H-chondrite. > > So, getting back to Larry's unusual, tiny iron find. If this > iron did not start at the top of the atmospere as a very tiny > piece of iron, there would be no way to ablate it, let alone > punch a hole through it. Since the Franconia irons were once > part of a massive chondritic meteoroid, there was no opportunity > for these irons to experience independent, high altitude, high > velocity ablation. Their ablation history wouldn't have started > until the main H-chondrite body had fragmented on a gigantic > scale (e.g. terminal burst), which of course would have > occurred at comparatively low altitude. > > On a final note, the H-chondrite fall at Franconia was not > a recent one. While this part of NW Arizona receives little > seasonal rainfall, I don't imagine that a 0.1-gram piece of > iron could survive more than a century. But a manmade piece > of iron, dropped there in the last 50 years, might possibly > survive terrestrial weathering. > > I would love nothing more than for Larry's find to have an > extraterrestrial origin; but the physics and history of finds > at Franconia argue strongly against it. > > Best wishes, > Rob > > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-listReceived on Sun 09 May 2010 12:35:13 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |