[meteorite-list] Huge Increase in Meteorite "help me" or "buy me" emails.
From: cdtucson at cox.net <cdtucson_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:20:36 -0400 Message-ID: <20100322162036.PJMRK.171904.imail_at_fed1rmwml36> Al, Brilliantly stated. look no farther than Almahatta sitta. It's crust is wrong (some pieces have crusts with holes in them while others have no crust) . It's SG weight is wrong (most meteorites feel heavy whereas most of these do not) . It's morphology and texture are wrong ( most meteorites are smooth while many of these are very rough and jagged and have pores ) . It's lack of metal ( some pieces lack metal) And finally , some pieces look totally different than others (because they are totally different) Very cool. Between Almahatta Sitta and Lovina alone, it seems to me we need to take a second and third look at every prospect. As these are two of the most amazing meteorites ever. I hear there will soon be announced a new meteorite that is nearly 50% magnetite? Carl -- Carl or Debbie Esparza Meteoritemax ---- almitt2 at localnet.com wrote: > Greetings Mike and all, > > Good topic and I want to comment on it. Not aimed at anyone person, but > perhaps aimed at new dealers or collectors who might want to try to > identify meteorites. > > It is important to not dismiss samples too quickly when checking them > out. Going through the proper tests and taking time to really look is > important. There is ALWAYS a possibility that some new type material > might be found that doesn't fit in to the norm of meteorites you might > have or have seen. Nininger pointed this out. Try to look for fall > features, structure on a micro level, crust and the many other features > an sample might have. If you can't dismiss it too easily then you might > want to send it to a good lab to have some testing done on it. I am > sure there have been specimens found that didn't fit in the norm and > were thrown out as wrongs. > > Checking out specimens is a big responcibilty to the owner of the > material and must be done in the most cautious way so no item is > overlooked. Best > > --AL Mitterling > > > > > Hi List! > > > > Are any of the other dealers noticing a big increase in emails from > > unknown people wanting you to ID their suspected meteorite or buy > > their suspected meteorite? > > > > In the last couple of weeks, I have gotten a flood of emails from > > people around the country and the world - all wanting me to identify > > their obvious meteorwrong, or to purchase their meteorwrong. One guy > > claimed to be in China, but had a Russian email address, and he > > attached some photos of an obvious industrial slag which he claimed > > was a meteorite and he even had a bogus "lab report" to prove it. > > Some of these are honest folks who are confused or misinformed, but > > many are scammers. Do the scammers think because we deal meteorites, > > we must be dumb or something? Because some of these so-called > > "meteorites" they try to push on me are obviously bogus - so bogus a > > blindman or a fool could tell they are not meteorites. > > > > Is this another after-effect from the Meteorite Men TV show? Or just > > a fluke? > > > > Best regards, > > > > MikeG > > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-listReceived on Mon 22 Mar 2010 04:20:36 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |