[meteorite-list] Scale Cubes

From: Greg Catterton <star_wars_collector_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <664241.9876.qm_at_web46406.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>

This has been a good discussion.
The 1cm scale cubes I use do not have any markings on them to clearly show it to be 1cm.
I usually provide the information in listings and such, but after reading the posts, I think I am going to mark mine as 1cm to clearly show it in the picture.

Greg Catterton
www.wanderingstarmeteorites.com
IMCA member 4682
On Ebay: http://stores.shop.ebay.com/wanderingstarmeteorites


--- On Mon, 3/15/10, Impactika at aol.com <Impactika at aol.com> wrote:

> From: Impactika at aol.com <Impactika at aol.com>
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Scale Cubes [WAS: Ad Announcing the "Count" cube Scale /...
> To: damoclid at yahoo.com, meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Date: Monday, March 15, 2010, 4:20 PM
> Richard and all,
>
> I believe that one of the original uses was archaeology.
> When an archaeologist would find an artifact he wanted to
> take pictures
> from all sides before digging out. So let's say it was a
> pot in a grave, he
> would shot the north/south/east/west sides of the pot,
> turning the cube every
> time so in later studies in a lab they would be able to
> recreate the tomb and
> the exact position of each object. So it was not only for
> size but also for
> exact angle/position of each artifact by itself and also in
> relation to all
> the others.
>
> And I agree that a scale cube should show clearly what the
> scale is. Less
> than honest sellers (on Ebay, for instance!) could be
> tempted to use one for
> the other. Another reason why I don't believe we should use
> any coin or key,
> or....etc. Yes, we in the US know that a dime is 18 mm
> across, but we
> should not expect someone on the other side of the globe to
> know that.
>
> Just my 2mm.
>
> Anne M. Black
> _http://www.impactika.com/_ (http://www.impactika.com/)
> _IMPACTIKA at aol.com_
> (mailto:IMPACTIKA at aol.com)
>
> Vice-President, I.M.C.A. Inc.
> _http://www.imca.cc/_ (http://www.imca.cc/)
>
>
> In a message dated 3/15/2010 2:32:37 AM Mountain Daylight
> Time,
> damoclid at yahoo.com
> writes:
> Shawn, Matt,
>
> If I'm not mistaken, the scale cube was invented
> specifically for the lunar
> samples brought back by the Apollo missions.
>
> Obviously, the idea behind using a scale cube is just that,
> to show the
> scale of the object in the photograph.
>
> I agree that for good scientific reasons, a scale cube in
> some metric
> measurement makes the most sense. A cubic centimeter is
> most common, but why not
> a cubic decimeter or a cubic meter, if those are
> appropriately sized for the
> object? I have no problem with any sized scale cube as long
> as the
> dimension is clearly marked and visible in the photograph.
> 1-cm, 1 inch, no matter.
> There is no "standard" so to speak. The key is to use
> something of the
> appropriate scale for the object being photographed...
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>


      
Received on Mon 15 Mar 2010 04:27:13 PM PDT