[meteorite-list] The Perils of Type Collecting - A Guide
From: Richard Kowalski <damoclid_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 15:38:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <396037.71872.qm_at_web113618.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Thanks a lot Mike. I thought I had pretty much completed my type set a few months ago, but now I see that I'm missed a few gradations that maybe I should pay attention to. I think, for budgetary and sanity sake, I'll have to be selective in how fine my divisions are than to try to get every sub-type you mention! -- Richard Kowalski Full Moon Photography IMCA #1081 --- On Wed, 3/3/10, Galactic Stone & Ironworks <meteoritemike at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Galactic Stone & Ironworks <meteoritemike at gmail.com> > Subject: [meteorite-list] The Perils of Type Collecting - A Guide > To: "Meteorite List" <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> > Date: Wednesday, March 3, 2010, 4:18 PM > Greetings Listees and fellow > collectors, > > To the veteran collector, there will be little of interest > in this > post.? This post is directed at the silent newbie or > beginner lurkers > who are sorting through this List and trying to find their > way around > the world of collecting meteorites. > > Many new collectors often want one of each type of > meteorite.? Many > veteran collectors abandon this pursuit because the task is > quite > daunting.???So when you hear talk about > "type collecting", or building > a "type collection", what exactly does that mean?? I > hope the > following brief article will answer those questions, or at > least point > the reader in the right general direction.? Note, I > gleaned much of > this type information from David Weir's authoritative > website > "Meteorite Studies" and from the Meteoritical > Bulletin.? I do not > claim that this list is 100% complete or without error, so > if the > reader spots an error or omission, please reply and correct > it. > > ----- > > The Perils of Type Collecting ........ > > I started out collecting meteorites with a small sample of > NWA 4293 - > an ordinary high iron chondrite of the H6 type. It was > about the size > of a dog-food kibble and it looked like one. But I was > instantly > hooked, and I wanted to have one each of the different > types of > meteorite. This is known as "type collecting" or building a > "type > collection". > > The danger of type collecting (besides the damage to one's > checking > account) is that the various petrologic types are > subdivided into > various grades according to metamorphism. > > For example, take the H chondrite group that my NWA 4293 > sample belonged to. > > There are H3 chondrites, H4 chondrites, H5 chondrites, and > H6 > chondrites. Did I really need one each of these subtypes? > Well, it > depends on how deep a collector wants to go into the rabbit > hole. > There are distinct differences between the various H types. > The number > attached to each is more than just a simple weathering > grade or shock > grade. It represents a progession in the H-chondrite family > from least > altered to most altered. H3 chondrites are loaded with > chondrules, H4 > have some chondrules, H5 has few chondrules, and H6 has > virtually no > visible chondrules. A new grade of H7 has been added as > well. So, a > collector could simply have a single Hx chondrite and say > that the > H-chondrites are represented. Or, the collector could have > one each of > the different subtypes from 3 to 7. > > Another peril is the changing of nomenclature. For example, > the > K-subgroup of carbonaceous chondrites was only recognized > and > designated in 1990. Up until then, Karoonda was considered > a CV4 > meteorite of the Vigarano family. Now Karoonda is > recognized as > distinctly different type of carbonaceous chondrite, so it > was made > into it's own group. Now we have CK4, CK5, and CK6 > meteorites - all > represent a progression in metamorphism and have visible > (and > chemical) differences from other grades. There are standout > members of > each subgroup, so where does one draw the line? Should the > collector > acquire a sample of Karoonda and be done with it? Or should > the > collector go out and track down CK4, CK5 and CK6 > meteorites? Again, it > depends on how extensive and exhaustive a collector wants > to be with > their type collection. Budget will also play a role as > well, because > an exhaustive type collection is a daunting project. > > Lastly, one must consider the ungrouped meteorites. These > are oddball > meteorites that do not neatly fit into the pre-existing > meteorite > types. There are ungrouped chondrites, ungrouped > achondrites, and > ungrouped irons. No type collection can overlook these > meteorites > because some of them are types unto themselves with unique > qualities. > > For those who want to build a definitive and complete type > collection, > here is a list of every known type and subtype of > meteorite. This list > was culled from other sources, including David Weir's > authoritative > "Meteorite Studies" website linked at the end of this > post. > > Carbonaceous Chondrites : > > CI (Ivuna) > CM1 (Murchison) > CM2 (subdivided into CM2.0 to CM2.6) > CM3 > CO3 (Ornans) (subdivided into CO3.03 to CO3.7) > CV (Vigarano) (also CV2 and CV3) > CK (Karoonda) (CK4, CK5, CK6) > CR (Renazzo) (CR1, CR2, CR3) > CB (Bencubbin) > CH > CR ungrouped > C4 ungrouped > C ungrouped (Tagish Lake, others) > > > Ordinary Chondrites : > > Rumuruti R3 (subdivided into R3.5-6 to R3.9) > R4 > R5 > R6 > > LL (subdivided into LL3.0 to LL3.9) > LL4 > LL5 > LL5/6 > LL6 > LL6/7 > LL7 > LL impact melt > > LL transitional (L/LL3 to L/LL6) > L (subdivided into L3.0 to L3.9) > L4 > L5 > L6 > L6/7 > L7 > L impact melt > > H/L transitional (H/L3 to H/L6 IMB, H/L3.6 to H/L3-4) > H (subdivided into H3.0 to H3.9) > H4 > H5 > H6 > H7 > H impact melt > ungrouped ordinary chondrites > > > Enstatite Chondrites : > > EL (EL3 to EL7) > EL impact melt > EH/L > EH (EH3 to EH7) > EH impact melt > ungrouped enstatite chondrites > > K (Kakangari) > > Meta-chondrites (M-CV, M-CR, M-H, M-LL) > > > Primitive Chondrites : > > Acapulcoite > Lodranite > Winonaites > ungrouped primitive chondrites > > > Achondrites : > > Howardite (subdivided into fragmental breccia and regolith > breccia) > Eucrite (monomict and polymict with each having > subclasses) > Diogenite (monomict and polymict) > Olivine Diogenite > Dunite > Ureilite (monomict and polymict) > > > Martian achondrites : > > Shergottite > Pyroxene-phyric basaltic shergottite > Olivine-phyric basaltic shergottite > Olivine-orthopyroxene-phyric basaltic shergottite > Pyroxene-peridotitic (Wehrlitic) shergottite > Lherzolitic shergottite > Diabasic shergottite > > Nakhlite > Chassignite > Orthopyroxenite (ALH 84001) > > > Lunar Achondrites : > > Feldspathic breccias > Regolith breccia > Fragmental breccia > Impact melt breccia > Granulitic breccia > Mafic-rich > Thorium-rich > KREEP-rich > > Mingled Breccia > Mare Basalt > > > Other Achondrites : > > Angrites (Plutonic and Basaltic) > Brachinite > Aubrite > ungrouped achondrites (Ibitira, Pasamonte, etc) > > > Stony-Irons : > > Mesosiderites (1A,1B,2A,2B,2C,3A,3B,4A,4B) > ungrouped mesosiderites > > Pallasites (Main Group, Eagle Station group, Pyroxene > group) > Pallasite-am (anomalous, PMG-am, PMG-as) > ungrouped pallasites > > > Iron meteorites : > > Note, iron meteorites are a can of worms. I will only focus > on the > main chemical groups, and not the various grouplets and > sub-types of > each main chemical group.? Also note that many of > these types include > silicated varities.? Listing all of the known > sub-types of irons would > require a LONG list resembling a flow-chart. > > IAB > IC > IIAB > IIC > IID > IIE > IIF > IIG > IIIAB > IIIE > IIIF > IVA > IVB > ungrouped irons > > I think that is all of them - as currently recognized by > the > Meteoritical Society Nomenclature Committee. If anyone can > think of > some I missed, please add them to this list. > > David Weir's Meteorite Studies website - http://www.meteoritestudies.com/ > > Best regards and happy collecting! > > MikeG > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Mike Gilmer - Galactic Stone & Ironworks Meteorites > http://www.galactic-stone.com > http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >Received on Wed 03 Mar 2010 06:38:22 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |