[meteorite-list] A Twisted Meteor Trail Over Tenerife: camera bump
From: Elizabeth Warner <warnerem_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 18:09:09 -0400 Message-ID: <4C082805.1010603_at_astro.umd.edu> As someone who has taken lots of astrophotos, mostly using a tripod and having several hundred pictures ruined because of bumping the tripod or camera shake from the mirror flapping up, those squiggles are not from either of those. If the camera had shaken, the buildings and everything else would also exhibit that and they don't. The stars are slightly trailed (because he is not tracking on the stars!! That's why they appear as dashes) as well as having some coma (the orientation of which changes in different parts of the picture as that should). Camera shake will affect everything in the image and I'm just not seeing those signs that would scream "camera shake!" Clear Skies! Elizabeth Murray Paulson wrote: > Hi: > > Note the second meteor trail is also wiggly. And as Robert noted it is > in the same axix as the "trailing" of the stars, This must have been > high frequency vibration to produce that many periods on the train. > > Murray > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Matson, Robert D. > <ROBERT.D.MATSON at saic.com> wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >>> A Twisted Meteor Trail Over Tenerife >>> Astronomy Picture of the Day, June 2, 2010 >> http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap100602.html >> >>> "Did this meteor take a twisting path? No one is sure. Considered >> opinions are solicited." >> >>> APOD: A Twisted Meteor Trail Over Tenerife (2010 Jun 02) >>> http://bb.nightskylive.net/asterisk/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=19638 >>> >> http://bb.nightskylive.net/asterisk/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=19638&sid=651816 >> 506a79643b02a83499866b4cdb&start=25 >> >> There is no doubt that this wiggle was due to a camera bump during the >> 1-minute >> exposure. A meteor at low elevation angle means it was fairly distant -- >> at least >> 300 km. The amplitude of the sinuoidal motion is so great that no >> meteoroid of >> *any* shape, no matter how bizarre, could move in this fashion. For >> those still >> in doubt, look at the stars in the zoomed insert: they, too, are >> blurred, with >> a long axis that is consistent with the direction of the meteor >> oscillations. >> >> --Rob >> ______________________________________________ >> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >> > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > Received on Thu 03 Jun 2010 06:09:09 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |