[meteorite-list] Updated Lorton trajectory

From: Shawn Alan <photophlow_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:25:18 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <188822.7120.qm_at_web113609.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>

Rob and Listers,

When I put these coordinates in from the new estimated impact predictions for the Lortan?meteorite?in google maps, the new impact sites are in?Antarctica. Am I doing something wrong or is there a number off in the coordinates that's giving me a wrong location?

Shawn Alan

Mass Longitude Latitude Distance Bearing
----- --------- -------- -------- -------
3 g -77.1383 38.7130 4.05 77.9
10 g -77.1635 38.7104 2.68 75.5
30 g -77.1804 38.7077 1.75 74.0
100 g -77.1976 38.7043 0.80 71.8
300 g -77.2116 38.7007 -0- N/A
1 kg -77.2282 38.6965 0.94 252.1
3 kg -77.2415 38.6923 1.72 250.2
10 kg -77.2560 38.6874 2.57 249.0




[meteorite-list] Updated Lorton trajectoryRob Matson mojave_meteorites at cox.net
Wed Jan 27 04:13:46 EST 2010


Previous message: [meteorite-list] Additional GPS files for Tucson visitors
Next message: [meteorite-list] Updated Lorton trajectory
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi All,

I finally received a good second image of the Lorton bolide smoke
trail taken immediately after the fall (and before upper atmospheric
winds distorted it). More importantly, the two images I have were
taken from sufficiently different vantage points that a good 3D
solution could be computed. (My early, somewhat hurried "first-cut"
at the trajectory was based on only a single image, and a cobbling
together of 50+ witness reports.) That first solution wasn't bad
as far as the flight direction (NNE -> SSW); however, as steep as
I made the entry angle, I didn't make it steep enough.

The Lorton meteoroid entered at a surprisingly steep angle -- about
15 degrees from vertical! If upper atmospheric winds had been
light, this would have made for a very tight strewnfield. But
those winds were anything but light at the time of the fall. For
instance, at 11-km altitude, the jet stream was over 90 knots!
Even down at 5-km altitude, the wind was over 40 knots.

So here are my new impact predictions as a function of mass.
The distance and bearing columns are in miles and degrees,
respectively, relative to the impact coordinates of the 308-gram
mass:

Mass Longitude Latitude Distance Bearing
----- --------- -------- -------- -------
3 g -77.1383 38.7130 4.05 77.9
10 g -77.1635 38.7104 2.68 75.5
30 g -77.1804 38.7077 1.75 74.0
100 g -77.1976 38.7043 0.80 71.8
300 g -77.2116 38.7007 -0- N/A
1 kg -77.2282 38.6965 0.94 252.1
3 kg -77.2415 38.6923 1.72 250.2
10 kg -77.2560 38.6874 2.57 249.0

As before, these coordinates (when you connect the dots) trace
out a curve of the estimated strewn field centerline. Unfortunately,
the lightest (and presumably more numerous) fragments would have
been windblown onto Ft. Belvoir. But there is still some room ENE
of the doctor's office that is not on military land, and plenty
of real estate in the "heavy direction" (WSW) if you're feeling
lucky. --Rob
Received on Thu 28 Jan 2010 12:25:18 AM PST