[meteorite-list] The Convincing Identification of TerrestrialMeteorite Impact Strutures

From: lebofsky at lpl.arizona.edu <lebofsky_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:58:13 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <c8975824751fe79115125aa6a80031c7.squirrel_at_webmail.lpl.arizona.edu>

Hi Sterling:

No, you are not paying for it twice. The government (we) pay for the
research, but do not pay for the publication costs. I do not think that
Science has page charges for authors, so someone has to pay the people who
run the magazine, print it, and distribute it (real jobs). Also, some of
these magazines actually are in the business to make money (though know
that only from second-hand experience).

This, however, does not mean that I understand/support the amount of money
that Sciencedirect charges as I do not know their cost structure.

Larry

> Thanks, Paul,
>
> Few people have been a greater help
> in filling my hard drive than you.
>
> Just in case, others were perplexed by it,
> the first URL costs $31.50 for the paper:
> http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.10.009
>
> It's the second URL that is the FREE one:
> http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=PublicationURL&_tockey=%23TOC%235802%232010%23999019998%231570149%23FLA%23&_cdi=5802&_pubType=J&view=c&_auth=y&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=2e423780e17d5ed60d7ca17a1faf9e9b
>
> And, yes, the first paper was made available by
> taxpayer dollars, so we have to pay for it twice...
> naturally.
>
> Thanks for all these sources. (The paper on
> Astronomical Dating is a good read also.)
>
>
> Sterling K. Webb
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Heinrich" <oxytropidoceras at cox.net>
> To: "Meteorite List" <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 10:19 PM
> Subject: [meteorite-list] The Convincing Identification of
> TerrestrialMeteorite Impact Strutures
>
>
>> Frencha, B. M., and C. Koeberl, 2010, The convincing
>> identification of terrestrial meteorite impact structures:
>> What works, what doesn't, and why. Earth-Science
>> Reviews. vol. 98, no. 1-2, pp. 123-170.
>>
>> Abstract at:
>>
>> http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.10.009
>> http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=PublicationURL&_tockey=%23TOC%235802%232010%23999019998%231570149%23FLA%23&_cdi=5802&_pubType=J&view=c&_auth=y&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=2e423780e17d5ed60d7ca17a1faf9e9b
>>
>> The PDF file for this paper and issue is open access
>> and can be freely downloaded.
>>
>> Yours,
>>
>> Paul H.
>> ______________________________________________
>> Visit the Archives at
>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
Received on Sat 27 Feb 2010 05:58:13 PM PST


Help support this free mailing list:



StumbleUpon
del.icio.us
reddit
Yahoo MyWeb