[meteorite-list] Hibben and YD impacts
From: Paul H. <oxytropidoceras_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 8:50:18 -0500 Message-ID: <20100405095018.K8MIL.1207167.imail_at_eastrmwml32> E.P. Grondine wrote "I was wondering if anyone here would like to apologize to Frank Hibben: http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100331/full/464657a.html " Given that Frank Hibben's descriptions of his Alaskan muck along with his interpretations of the Alaskan muck and a major Alaskan Paleo-Indian Site have been demonstrated by various Cultural Resource Management reports and dozens of published peer-reviewed papers to be a mixture of science fiction and fantasy, there is nothing for anyone to apologize about. Also, I have just looked at the paper, which is: Murton, J. B., M. D. Bateman, S. R. Dallimore, J. T. Teller and Z. Yang, 2010, Identification of Younger Dryas outburst flood path from Lake Agassiz to the Arctic Ocean. Nature. vol. 464, no. 7289, pp. 740-743 doi:10.1038/nature08954 http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7289/abs/nature08954.html There is absolutely nothing in this paper that relates to the Alaskan loess deposits, which Hibben called "muck". In fact, there are innumerable OSL, radiocarbon dates, and dated ash beds that clearly demonstrate that Hibben's ?muck? deposits predate the Younger Dryas event by tens of thousands of years to over 3 million years. What is known about the age of the Alaskan "muck" precludes them from having any association with the draining of Lake Agassiz. E.P. Grondine wrote "or to Dr. Firestone." Again, going through the above paper, it is clear there is nothing in it that supports any of Firestone?s claims, i.e. his imaginary Chippewa Basin impact crater. There are the Charity Shoals in Lake Ontario and the Can-AM structure in Lake Huron. However, neither of these features are likely of the right age to be related to a Younger Dryas impact. The Can-AM structure is likely at least 500 million years old. There is nothing for anyone to apologize for. E.P. Grondine wrote ?By the way, the "blueberries" on Mars are impact vapor condensates, not water condensates.? A lot of geologists and impact specialists disagree with you. Best Wishes, Paul H. Received on Mon 05 Apr 2010 09:50:18 AM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |