[meteorite-list] Chondritic parent bodies

From: Meteorite-Recon.com <info_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:21:18 +0200
Message-ID: <19384660.1406321252502478117.JavaMail.servlet_at_kundenserver>

Hi Jeff, others,

certainly true as far as the majority of L-chondritic material is concerned. But Dave?s question is in so far justified as there are several exceptional L-chondrites that show particular differences in their lithology compared to other L-chondrites. If my information on this subject isn?t out of date, the group of L-chondrites around Mt. Tazerzait, Baszk?wka and Tjerebon are believed to originate from a different parent body as the other L-chondrites.

If my memory doesn?t cheat me in this matter these chondrites show a lesser degree of compaction and a high amount of interstitial pores with growth of euhedral to anhedral crystals in these vugs. A group around A. Pilski even argued that these crystals provide evidence for hydrothermal activity in the particular mother body of these L-chondrites.

Perhaps someone wants to look up the cosmic ray exposure data on the Mt. Tazerzait "grouplet" to see if a different shock event played a role in the production & delivery of these meteorites ...

I am clearly not an expert in this field so please beat me if I?am wrong here.

Cheers

Svend

www.meteorite-recon.com


---------------
Jeff Grossman wrote:

I'm not sure why you thought there was a definition that requires L5
and L6 chondrites to come from different parent asteroids... there
isn't. Questions like this are open to investigation. Isotopic data
show that the different petrologic types of L chondrites all
experienced a major shock event around 500 million years ago, which
means that at least many of them came from a single parent
body. Similarly, different petrologic types of H chondrites show
evidence for a break-up event around 7.5 million years ago. There is
still debate over the importance of "onion shell" vs. "rubble pile"
models of the asteroids, but not so much over whether the different
petrologic types come (or came) from a single asteroid.

jeff

At 11:40 PM 9/8/2009, Dave Gheesling wrote:
>All,
>Pete's question re: pallasites reminds me of one I've been meaning to throw
>out to the group for a while. I believe that, by definition, L6's come from
>one parent body and L5's, say, come from another. It's clear why breccias
>might simply be an association of the two. But I've seen cross section
>illustrations of hypothetical asteroids more than once which indicate a
>transitional progression from L3 material at the exterior/crust through L4,
>then L5, and eventually to L6 at the center/core. Presumably this is due to
>insulative properties and the like towards the interior which allow more
>heat from radioactivity to build up, etc, but this also seems to indicate a
>single parent body. I'm sure Sterling & Co. might have a field day with
>this one, and I'm looking forward to any responses out there...
>Thanks much,
>Dave
>
>Dave Gheesling
>IMCA #5967
>www.fallingrocks.com
>
>______________________________________________
>http://www.meteoritecentral.com
>Meteorite-list mailing list
>Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Dr. Jeffrey N. Grossman phone: (703) 648-6184
US Geological Survey fax: (703) 648-6383
954 National Center
Reston, VA 20192, USA


______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

-- 
www.meteorite-recon.com

Received on Wed 09 Sep 2009 09:21:18 AM PDT