[meteorite-list] Dean's BL NWA 1685

From: tett <tett_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 20:39:58 -0400
Message-ID: <4A1745DE.7060702_at_rogers.com>

Greg,

I was going to send some pics but the posting from Gary Fujihara
directing us to Jeff Kuyken's website does a better job.

What is really interesting is that there are very thin black shock veins
around these clasts indicating that these were introduced into the
matrix after the stones formed.
Mike

P.S. you got PayPal.


Greg Hupe wrote:
> Mike Mike, Pete, Bernd...All,
>
> Does anyone have a few close-up photos of these "achondritic" clasts
> Mike mentioned?
>
> Thanks!
> Greg
>
> ====================
> Greg Hupe
> The Hupe Collection
> NaturesVault (eBay)
> gmhupe at htn.net
> www.LunarRock.com
> IMCA 3163
> ====================
> Click here for my current eBay auctions:
> http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZnaturesvault
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "tett" <tett at rogers.com>
> To: "Pete Pete" <rsvp321 at hotmail.com>
> Cc: "meteoritelist meteoritelist" <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 8:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Dean's BL NWA 1685
>
>
> Pete,
>
> Just a few weeks ago I was speaking with people from the Royal Ontario
> Museum and they have material and are hopefully able to do some research
> on it soon. There is still high interest in this stuff and I too want
> to see some more testing and classification done on it. It would be
> great to learn what these very cool achondritic clasts are which abound
> throughout NWA1685.
>
> Ian, are you lurking? ;>)
> Cheers!
>
> Mike Tettenborn
>
> Also a proud owner of some beautiful BL slices and individuals.
>
>
> Pete Pete wrote:
>> Greetings, List,
>> I see a recent update as of May 20, 2009 at the Meteoritical
>> Society's bulletin for NWA 1685, but I don't see any new information
>> included.
>> http://tin.er.usgs.gov/meteor/metbull.php?code=32385
>> http://tin.er.usgs.gov/meteor/metbull.php?code=32385
>> Am I reading it right, that it has been submitted for classification
>> since 2003?!
>> If so, is this length of time normal? Would it be the examining
>> institution's discretion for how long it takes to finally put data to
>> paper for submission to the Meteoritical Society, or is the Met.
>> Society a bit swamped and behind?
>> I know that a lot of us have pieces of this gorgeous stone, and are
>> anxious for the final word.
>> Best,
>> Pete
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Create a cool, new character for your Windows Live? Messenger.
>> http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9656621
>> ______________________________________________
>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>
>>
> ______________________________________________
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
>
Received on Fri 22 May 2009 08:39:58 PM PDT