[meteorite-list] 'Chevrons' Are Not Evidence Of Megatsunamis

From: E.P. Grondine <epgrondine_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 14:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <504233.89900.qm_at_web36903.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Hi Sterling -

The best recent impact mega-tsunami data is several feet of sterile
"marine sediments" between occupation levels.

E.P. Grondine
Man and Impact in the Americas

--- On Fri, 5/1/09, Sterling K. Webb <sterling_k_webb at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> From: Sterling K. Webb <sterling_k_webb at sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] 'Chevrons' Are Not Evidence Of Megatsunamis
> To: "E.P. Grondine" <epgrondine at yahoo.com>, meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Date: Friday, May 1, 2009, 4:40 PM
> E.P., Paul, List,
>
> First, geology has a proof for everything, no
> matter how contradictory. Bortz and the
> Scablands, Wegener and Drift, "Strata"
> Smith and, well, strata. Takes a lifetime
> (literally) for truth to out. Not to mention
> how long it took for the existence of impacts
> to be accepted (50-60 years) by geologists.
> We still though the Moon was all volcanic
> surface features right up to the moment
> we got there. Duh.
>
> Second, rationization and models are not
> enough. That's why Reality has to count.
>
> Simple test. "Chevrons" have to be aligned
> (within some margin of error) with a crater
> or impact site in water or other event like
> massive mass-slip. Accumulate evidence of
> both. Assume margin of error of ten degrees
> in alignment (or pick your own figure). If
> you find 36 candidate chevrons and only
> one aligns with an impact or other causitive
> site, then the two are absolutely not connected.
>
> Of course, it's not that easy. Not all craters
> get found, not all tidal waves have a crater but
> another cause (seismic, mass-slip), but if more
> than 4 to 7 are aligned, the odds are many
> (most, some, you pick) chverons are indicators
> of such events.
>
> Takes a long time and the accumulation of lots
> of evidence, more than we have now, probably.
> Time (but not geologic time) will tell.
>
>
> Sterling K. Webb
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "E.P. Grondine" <epgrondine at yahoo.com>
> To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 3:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] 'Chevrons' Are Not Evidence
> Of
> Megatsunamis
>
>
> >
> > Hi Paul, all -
> >
> >
> > A rather cryptic article, but then one might think
> that these
> > researchers may have considered another hypothesis,
> that yet another
> > impact mega-tsunami occured.
> >
> > I suppose this belongs with Keller's latest results as
> well.
> >
> > But then denial is not simply a river in Egypt.
> >
> > E.P. Grondine
> > Man and Impact in the Americas
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > http://www.meteoritecentral.com
> > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
>


      
Received on Fri 01 May 2009 05:59:14 PM PDT