[meteorite-list] Fwd: Re: Fusion Crusted "Meteoroids"
From: cdtucson at cox.net <cdtucson_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:03:58 -0700 Message-ID: <20090325160358.HMHW4.579641.imail_at_fed1rmwml46> > Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:49:25 -0700 > From: <cdtucson at cox.net> > To: cynapse at charter.net > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Fusion Crusted "Meteoroids" > > DARREN, > THERE YOU GO AGAIN RAMBLEING WITH YOUR WORTHLESS AND SARCASTIC INFORMATION. > ---- Darren Garrison <cynapse at charter.net> wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:39:27 -0700, you wrote: > > > > >Further when you look up into space there are a > > >gazzillion sources of crust producing bodies. > > > > No, there are not. There is a very small number, definable as the number of > > planets and moons with an appreciable atmosphere. Are you suggesting that other > > stars could be making fusion crusts on meteoroids in this solar system? > OTHER PLANETS NOT STARS. YOU SIMPLY DON'T KNOW EVEN IF YOU THINK YOU DO! > > > > >And look at the age of most meteorites. It seem to > > >me 4.56 billion years gives these space travelers > > >plenty of time to have visited enough places to pick > > >up fusion crusts here and there. > > > > The original formation of the solar system was 4.56 billion years ago. However, > > the lifetime of individual small meteoroids is much, much shorter than that. > IS IT REALLY? THEN WHY DO WE CONSIDER THESE METEORITES ARE THE AGE THEY ARE WHICH IS IN THE 4.5 BILLION YEAR RANGE? DO YOU REALLY NOT KNOW HOW OLD METEORITES ARE? AGAIN, READ ANY OF NORTON'S BOOKS. > > > > >I earlier went on to theorize that perhaps this pre-fusion > > >crust might actually help protect the material and up the > > >odds of a safe landing here on earth. ( Yes it becomes > > >a heat shield and helps protect the material at least enough > > >to salvage some of the material.) > > > > A heat shield must be made of a material with a melting point higher than that > > of the material being protected, or else a thick enough layer that it would not > > all be ablated away before slowing down. A thin fusion crust of the same > > material the rest of the meteoroid is made from would not act as a heat shield. > YES A MELTED COMBINATION OF ALL OF THESE MATERIALS WOULD BE STRONGER THAN IT'S ORIGINAL INDIVIDUAL PARTS. AND WE HAVE NO IDEA HOW THICK OR THIN THIS EARLY CRUST MIGHT BE DO WE? IT MAY START OUT SEVERAL INCHES THICK. WE SIMPLY HAVE NO WAY OF KNOWING. AGAIN , WE CAN ONLY GUESS. > > > > >This only makes sense because we all know that some finds > > >and falls simple have NO crust at all. > > > > It makes sense to say that some meteoroids have a fusion crust heat shield that > > protects them from ablating during atmospheric entry because we find some > > meteorites with no fusion crust... > FIGURE IT OUT DARREN, YOU ARE NOT THAT STUPID. YOU KNOW WHAT I MEANT BUT YOU WOULD RATHER BE AN A SS. WE ALL KNOW YOU BY NOW. > CARL > > ______________________________________________ > > http://www.meteoritecentral.com > > Meteorite-list mailing list > > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Wed 25 Mar 2009 04:03:58 PM PDT |
 StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit Yahoo MyWeb
|