[meteorite-list] Dam Hammer

From: Matthias Bärmann <majbaermann_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:42:05 +0100
Message-ID: <1EFB5F715EB34D1AA2ACF6996A535ECF_at_thinkcentre>

..... and don't forget your genom sequential kit when go out hunting. A dead
sheep on the meadow, killed by a meteorite - wonderful, but: attention!
Could be good ol' Dolly (man-made = hammer = forget all your problems), but
usually a normal standard sheep (ram-made = ahm, non-hammer = hello ebay)
... delicate matter ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZk2uMrQBSQ

Best, Matthias

----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Altmann" <altmann at meteorite-martin.de>
To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Dam Hammer


"IMHO, the fault lies not in the use of the term, but the existance of it."

Darren, you hit the nail on the head -
You're a hammer!
Thank you for that.

Next step would be, to dissociate the "hammer"-concept from solely
meteorites and to extend it e.g. on hailstones, lightning strokes, birds,
airplanes, apples & pears, flower pots and roof tiles...and who says, that a
hammer as always to happen vertically?

and a new field of collecting is born. Hammer Collecting...
and then we can leave that kind of discussion to the expert collectors from
there and could later overtake their definitions.

Huh, here in Central-Europe most of the landscape, fields, meadows, forests
are shaped by men.... we have a huge potential of not yet revealed hammers
sitting in our cupboards.

Btw.
Are non-observed falls, so called "finds" also allowed to be called
"hammers" if they're found in the right place?



-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Darren
Garrison
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. M?rz 2009 20:14
An: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Dam Hammer

On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:57:59 -0400, you wrote:

>Michael Blood has an opinion, not a rule. If a meteorite lands in my yard
or
>a baseball field does it qualify as a "hammer" since these places were man
>made? Over use of a term for marketing (not saying Steve had done this
here)
>is simply stupid!

IMHO, the fault lies not in the use of the term, but the existance of it.
The
fact that you can pick and choose which human created, human maintained
objects
(which would quickly fall into disrepair and soon after fall apart without
peirodic maintainance) qualify as "hammer worthy" and which don't are the
fault
of the ambiguity of the term, not of those using the term. Or else, someone
needs to compound an official, authoritative list of what an artifact needs
to
be built from before something hitting it can become a hammering. And the
shape
of the thing would have to be accounted for, too-- if a earthern dam doesn't
count, how about a mud-roofed hut somewhere?
______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Wed 18 Mar 2009 03:42:05 PM PDT