[meteorite-list] - Fisher Gold Bug owners?

From: Erik Fisler <erikfwebb_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 01:14:52 -0700
Message-ID: <COL119-W30C5437A847545098196AA44C0_at_phx.gbl>

The second version has a substantially higher frequency so it's really hot on metal.
John Wolfe's can pick up some gold basin L's and Palo Verde Mine L's that a GMT can't.
He showed me some very nice specimen gold too.
 
With my Dad's Gold Bug Origional, I have found bird shot 8 inches deep, as loud as a wistle.
Either one is good on meteorites but I would sugest paying for the version two.
 
[Erik]
> From: lintonius at earthlink.net
> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 23:57:23 -0700
> Subject: [meteorite-list] - Fisher Gold Bug owners?
>
> Greetings listees.
> I know some of you prefer to use the Fisher Gold Bug II metal detectors.
> I've been watching for a "pre-owned model" and what I'm wondering is...
> Is the difference between the Gold Bug II and the original subtle, or
> substantial?
> Should I bother with the original at a good price, or hold out for the newer
> model?
> Either way, this will be my first detector. Any advice would be highly
> appreciated.
> Thank you.
> Linton
>
> ______________________________________________
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Mon 01 Jun 2009 04:14:52 AM PDT