[meteorite-list] Meteorite hunting ethics
From: Rob Matson <mojave_meteorites_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 00:12:48 -0700 Message-ID: <GOEDJOCBMMEHLEFDHGMMGEHFDNAA.mojave_meteorites_at_cox.net> Hi All, Joe writes: > There is nothing "illegal" about the way Carl found it... I didn't say there was. My post was more about ethics and hypothetical situations. > Just cuz somebody makes the first find, no matter who it is > does not own the strewnfield, not by any means, unless it > is on his property. Irrelevant to the discussion. Did I ever say anywhere in my post that Jack has exclusive rights to his discovery location? No. > ...just cuz it is in AZ they feel the need to sccop it all > up for themselves, thats not right... Jack has never said anything of the sort; and Mike has already pointed out that if you found the fall location *independently*, then you would have just as much right to be there as they do (assuming it didn't violate existing arrangements with any property owners). > I see it as selfish... I see it as SMART. Frankly, I would rather have scientifically- minded people helping to recover a new fall because they actually care about science, not because of fame or profit. > Who is to say Carl will not get GPS coordinance and in situ > photo? If he finds anything, perhaps he will. Indeed, I hope he would. > After the way Jack, Mike and the other acted, I would > not give them any info on my finds, they are not doing the > same for anyone else. If this is really how you feel, I can't say I'd be very interested in enlisting your help to recover a new fall. For the scientists, this isn't a game. It isn't about money, or petty jealousies. It's about quality scientific data. Every meteorite that is recovered "improperly" is a lost data point. If I was in Jack's shoes (which to some degree, I am) I would feel no obligation whatsoever to share my hard-earned results with anyone until I was damned good and ready. > This fall just shows the true colors of some of the hunters. Quite so. > Like you said, when Jack invited Farmer he knew there was a chance > that somebody may find the strewnfield cuz he is so high profile. > He took that chance and it happened. Maybe it happened, maybe it didn't. You only have Carl's say-so at this point. As far as I know, he doesn't have any meteorites as evidence to back up the claim. > Carl did not put a beacon on Mikes Car. Did I say he did? No. My hyperbole was meant to show how various levels of "cheating" were different only in magnitude, not flavor. They're all unethical to varying degrees. To summarize: 1. You don't have a right to know what Jack figured out. 2. Jack doesn't have a right to prevent you from figuring out what he did -- by your own scientific means. 3. If you aren't yet clever enough to do #2, then educate yourself so that you can. It's really not rocket science. --Rob Received on Sun 19 Jul 2009 03:12:48 AM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |