[meteorite-list] Yet another gimmicky expensive meteorite"collectable"
From: MeteorHntr at aol.com <MeteorHntr_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:13:13 EDT Message-ID: <c74.534f1a7e.3784c009_at_aol.com> MikeG and all, You said: "It is in nobody's best interest to restrict the search for, discovery of, and trade of meteorites." I want to correct you. It is in the financial short term best interest for researches and their institutions in a country to get grant money to study their new meteorites. If they let the new meteorites out of their borders, that is potentially millions of dollars those institutions won't get of grant money that someone else will get. That is the ONLY logical reason. A bad reason, but it is a reason. And that greed and selfishness is strong enough in some places to get the stupid laws past. As Martin pointed out, in many cases it might just be one researcher the nudges the right person to get such a law passed. Of course the results of such thinking is bad in the long term, but nowadays, no one seems to care about the long term, only the short term. Steve Arnold of "Meteorite Men" In a message dated 7/7/2009 9:41:36 A.M. Central Daylight Time, meteoritemike at gmail.com writes: Hi Martin and List, Well analyzed Martin. Reading your posts on these matters is like receiving an education. Now if we could just get the governments in question to read this list and consider what Martin has written extensively on, then we might see a return to reason. It is in nobody's best interest to restrict the search for, discovery of, and trade of meteorites. Best regards and clear skies, MikeG **************An Excellent Credit Score is 750. See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222585089x1201462806/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=62&bcd=Jul yExcfooterNO62) Received on Tue 07 Jul 2009 11:13:13 AM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |