[meteorite-list] Ten Most Scientifically Important Meteorites
From: catoni52 at sympatico.ca <catoni52_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:57:31 +0000 Message-ID: <COL0-F1470B15A68BDAA4CC43DA3A8B70_at_phx.gbl> <snipping all the previous replies to this question> Here goes. But I'm not going to let all the former posts be repeated. It's a waste of space and time in scrolling. I don't know why people do that. So many people continually repeating the previous posts in their replies. For what reason ??? This subject had all the previous replies repeated in at least six reply posts. I've seen it time and time again in this group. For what ???? Why do so many people repeat all the same posts over and over again when they post a reply????? Waste of our time scrolling, and waste of storage space. My choices: 1. ALH84001 2. Allende 3. Zagami 4. Murchison 5. NWA 482 (Of course the Apollo samples lower its scientific value, but I have NWA 482. :) I can't get any Apollo samples :( 6. Tagish Lake 7. Abee 8. l'Aigle 9. NWA 1877 10. Esquel Received on Sun 15 Feb 2009 11:57:31 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |