[meteorite-list] ENOUGH Speed-of-light question

From: Bob Loeffler <bobl_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:12:35 -0600
Message-ID: <20090826231246.188A4105AD_at_mailwash5.pair.com>

Hi Mike H. and all,

Even if some of the people on the list are interested, that doesn't mean
that it should be allowed. If it's not on-topic, it is still breaking the
list rule because it's not about meteorites, meteors, etc. The Alien and
matrix discussions were also not on topic. If we allow this to go on, then
everyone can post their own off-topic messages and we'll have a
free-for-all. Let's try to keep everything somewhat related to meteorites.
Otherwise, I'll start talking about my house or my Jeep or my cats (because
they are all on the Earth... and meteorites hit the Earth... therefore they
must be on-topic, right?). And then we'll have the Haiku poets come out of
the woodwork... argh. :-)

Thanks,

Bob



-----Original Message-----
From: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Mike
Hankey
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:55 PM
To: Michael Blood
Cc: Meteorite List
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] ENOUGH Speed-of-light question

i hear ya, and agree about being on topic, but there seems to be a
good bit of interest in this topic, so i'd say let it roll...? you can
tell from the subject what its related to, so you can easily delete
the emails without reading them if you're not interested. its kind of
fun / enjoyable for me to follow along, if it was off list, i would
miss a lot of these replies, i think this is in the same category as
the alien discussion and matrix discussions... not really meteor
related, but interesting none the less. I think volume of replies
often suggests a good topic people are interested in. I'm also eagerly
awaiting Rob's answer.

http://www.mikesastrophotos.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/jack-knows-best.j
pg

Mike Hankey,

http://www.mikesastrophotos.com

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Michael Blood<mlblood at cox.net> wrote:
> Please guys,
> ? ? ? ?This is not exactly hard core meteorite related.
> ? ? ? ?A few posts - ok ?- hell, a dozen posts, ok. But this
> On and on and on and on is enough already!
> ? ? ? ?Can those few of you obsessed with this take it off
> The list, please?
> ? ? ? ?( could be wrong - if there are dozens of List members
> Who want to see this stay on the list, go ahead and post to
> The list and in the subject line put "KEEP the SOL Q
> Going"
> ? ? ? ?Not to be a bummer - Michael
>
>
> On 8/26/09 10:35 AM, "Darren Garrison" <cynapse at charter.net> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:49:01 -0400, you wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, so what's the speed of dark?
>>>
>>
>> "The speed of dark is known to be greater than that of light. It must be,
>> otherwise the dark wouldn?t be able to get out of the light?s way."
>>
>> http://freespace.virgin.net/ianstewart.joat/MATHDW/light.html
>> ______________________________________________
>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.64/2318 - Release Date: 08/25/09
18:07:00
Received on Wed 26 Aug 2009 07:12:35 PM PDT