[meteorite-list] A few odd questions on The Meteorite Men
From: Gary Fujihara <fujmon_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:54:34 -1000 Message-ID: <E4F84A90-B453-4957-9537-046D7559D7DF_at_mac.com> Aloha Geoff, cc: Meteorite listees I know that your show is airing nationwide, but I don't get the Science Channel, and was hoping that you, or someone else on the metlist can record the episodes for me on tape or DVD. I would gladly exchange said recording(s) for a delicious chondrite ;^) gary On Aug 20, 2009, at 7:48 AM, Notkin wrote: >> The commentator made it sound like there were two separate falls of >> the Brenham pallasite in the same strewnfield. How can one area be >> more recent than another of the same fall? > > Dear Carl: > > Good morning from Tucson. Thank you for watching the show and for > the feedback. I really enjoyed the segment with Meenakshi as well. > The reference collection at ASU is outstanding and it is a treat > just to get to visit. > > Carl, I just want to be sure you are clear that we filmed at two > separate strewnfields. Brenham and Alpha are entirely different > pallasites. Alpha is just a code name we used because we were still > at the second site at the time of filming, and wanted to complete > our work there before announcing any details. > > There is a very brief comment about the Alpha crystals. The narrator > states, if I recall correctly: "the Alpha stones made the tumultuous > journey to Earth without shattering." In another segment that > unfortunately did not make the final cut, Meenakshi talks about how > the olivine crystals in the Brenham pallasites are believed to have > been shocked and shattered in space (possibly by asteroidal > collisions) rather than as a result of impact on the Earth and/or > subsequent weathering. With only 43 minutes of actual air time, once > you discount the commercials, there is a lot of information we want > to include, but there were some other informative segments that also > had to be left out. It is very useful to hear feedback regarding > parts of the show that were not clear to you, and I'll forward your > comments to our director and producer. > > So, the conclusion is: Brenham crystals were shattered at some point > in the distant past (in space) as a result of impact(s); the Alpha > crystals were not. That is why the Alpha crystals lend themselves to > being faceted into gemstones. We therefore infer that the Brenham > pallasites' parent body experienced some form of significant impact; > the Alpha pallasites' parent body did not. > > Please let me know if you have any other questions. It's really > helpful to receive some constructive criticism. Oh, and you were > right, the bottom of the big Brenhams were about 4 to 5 feet deep. I > always tease Steve because I think it's a more exciting experience > to dig them out by hand, but he's busy and wants to bring in the > backhoe : ) > > > Respectfully, > > Geoff N. > > www.aerolite.org > www.meteoritemen.com > www.meteoriteblog.org > ______________________________________________ > http://www.meteoritecentral.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Gary Fujihara AstroDay Institute 105 Puhili Place, Hilo, HI 96720 (808) 640-9161, fujmon at mac.com http://astroday.net Received on Thu 20 Aug 2009 01:54:34 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |