[meteorite-list] The Scoop on "Kem Kem"
From: Alexander Seidel <gsac_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:54:42 +0200 Message-ID: <20090816115442.141270_at_gmx.net> The "Lahmada" stones, found in Western Sahara in 1998 and 1999, were some of the last ones to get official Non-NWA names from the NomCom, before there was an agreement on the new Northwest Africa (NWA) designation. In fact, Lahmada 002 - 018 are still valid official names, while Lahmada 022 - 032 were synonyms for NWA 035 - 045 respectively. At least the first Lahmada stones also had distinct geographical find coordinates submitted to the NomCom. Some of the stones were later considered to be probably paired. PS: on a more personal side, I hold the main mass of Lahmada 007, a pretty fresh stone of 603.7 g (from a TKW of 620.6 g), which is fun to know it is one of the few last ones to get a Non-NWA name before the big NWA-rush began. This makes it a bit special for me, though it is nothing but a common H5 meteorite by class. :-) Alex Berlin/Germany -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:48:52 -0700 (PDT) > Von: dean bessey <deanbessey at yahoo.com> > An: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] The Scoop on "Kem Kem" > I just got back from australia and am sorting through thousands and > thousands of emails so my apologies if this has already been answered. > There is no recogonized meteorite term as "Kem Kem". > The term "Kem Kem" dates from the days just before the official creation > of the term "NWA" roughly 9 or 10 years ago. > Hundreds of kilos of meteorites were being sold at random in Morocco and > everybody (Including the met society) was trying to best figure out how to > catalog and deal with the situation of mixed meteorites from many different > falls thrown in together and sold in bulk (Not that big a deal nowadays but > A novel new thing 10 years ago). > Meteorite dealer Michael casper - now I believe (at least semi) retired, > got his hands on a large quantity (If I remember correctly 300 kilos but my > memory might be a little off after 10 years) and he sold them in bulk using > the name "KEM KEM" and saying that they were found in the Kem Kem desert. > They were very cheap for meteorites - I believe 30 or 40 cents a gram which > was I think the first time that any meteorite was ever publicly advertised > under $1 a gram. At the time everybody probably believed the Moroccans > story that they were found in the Kem Kem desert but of course nowadays we all > take location data with a grain of salt at best. > I was among Caspers buyers and on seeing them it was obvious that it was a > very mixed group of meteorites and from a very wide variety of falls. > Soon afterwards the name "NWA" was officially put in place and anything > classified from Caspers "Kem Kem" hoard (Including NWA001) was given a NWA > name. > If you see anything labelled Kem Kem it will almost surely be from caspers > one time 300 Kilo hoard that just pre dated NWA. Nobody else has ever used > that name as the introduction of NWA shortly afterwards cancelled peoples > need to try and make up names to describe their meteorites. > Almost certainly the location data of caspers 300 kilo hoard is just as > iffy as location data that you get nowadays so wither they were actually > found in Kem kem or not is really a moot point as nobody really cares about > such details nowadays. But your Kem Kem stones can be traced to a particular > buy from the early days and has that little extra bit of history to them. > They were a particularly nice group of meteorites also and better than any > 300 kilo mixed hoard that you are likely to find offered in morocco nowadays. > Sincerely > DEAN > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________ > http://www.meteoritecentral.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Sun 16 Aug 2009 07:54:42 AM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |