[meteorite-list] Question for type collectors
From: Michael Blood <mlblood_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:21:29 -0700 Message-ID: <C60B0339.2B94%mlblood_at_cox.net> I would, Though, like most things, it is a personal decision As to what constitutes a "category" and what does not. Best wishes, Michael > From: Galactic Stone & Ironworks <meteoritemike at gmail.com> > Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:14:33 -0500 > To: Meteorite List <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> > Subject: [meteorite-list] Question for type collectors > > Hi folks! > > I am not a type collector per-se, but I like to keep track of how many > different petrologic types I have in my collection. > > I have a silly question about type collecting - > > Do type collectors consider each type of iron a seperate petrologic > type? For example, are all octahedrites considered 1 type? Or is it > different types for "coarsest", "coarse", "medium", "fine", etc? > > Right now I have 42 petrologic types - counting ALL irons as only one > type. Should I go through my collection and correct that count to > reflect the different types - IIAB, IAB, IVA, etc? > > Thanks in advance! > > MikeG > > > -- > ......................................................... > Michael Gilmer (Louisiana, USA) > Member of the Meteoritical Society. > Member of the Bayou Region Stargazers Network. > Websites - http://www.galactic-stone.com and http://www.glassthrower.com > .......................................................... > ______________________________________________ > http://www.meteoritecentral.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Wed 15 Apr 2009 06:21:29 AM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |