[meteorite-list] Impact Duration Time
From: Chris Peterson <clp_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:01:39 -0600 Message-ID: <064b01c889d2$289af300$0a01a8c0_at_bellatrix> Strewn field shape is the product of two factors: (1) the meteoroid may break up over a long distance, and (2) individual components are distributed by wind during cold fall. In the first case, this breakup may cover a lot of ground, but happens while the meteoroid is still hypersonic. So no more than a few seconds separate the beginning and end of the breakup. After that, everything is falling at the same rate, so (in the absence of aerodynamic effects) will land at about the same time. In the second case, wind only affects the horizontal velocity component, so it has no effect on the landing time. The only significant factor is the timing introduced by the terminal velocities of the individual components. Given a reasonable range of shapes and sizes, you might have some components falling at 50 m/s, and others at 200 m/s. For a typical fall height, that means you could reasonably expect as much as 5-10 minutes between the first and last components reaching the ground. Chris ***************************************** Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Woolard" <meteoritefinder at yahoo.com> To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 8:40 AM Subject: [meteorite-list] Impact Duration Time > Hello List, > > Would any members be able to help with a question I > have regarding the "impact-duration-time" (???) of > some typical falls? I don't know if that's the best > terminology to use, but what I mean is: What would be > a "typical" measure of time between the impact of the > FIRST (known) individual at the start of the > strewnfield, and the fall of the LAST (known) > individual? I can't remember ever having read of any > instances where these times were actually determined. > I know the odds for accurate recordings of both of > these times would be very slim, but does anyone know > IF they have ever been recorded for a fall(s)? > > Also, is it a relatively simple matter of getting a > VERY rough ESTIMATE of the spread of time by simply > dividing the length of the strewnfield by a max free > fall speed of ~ 200mph??? I know that the angle of > entry, the wind speed, the density of the meteorite, > etc., would all affect the results, and the answer > from such a simple equation would truly give ONLY an > estimate if I'm right. But WOULD this give an > approximate duration time?? For instance, if a > strewnfield is ~ 7 miles long, would it be fairly > accurate to say that meteorites were impacting over > about a 2 minute spread of time during the fall? And > if the strewnfield was ~20 miles long, impacts may > have occurred over ~ 6 minutes? > > (7 miles/200mph = 0.035 hours,or = ~2.1 minutes) > > (20 miles/200mph =0.1 hours, or = ~ 6 minutes) > > > Finally, IF all the above is even halfway accurate, > could one safely say that during a "typical" fall, > meteorites are impacting down the length of the > strewnfield for approximately 1 to 5 minutes? Or am I > way off base? If this is right, I never thought about > the concept of meteorites hitting the ground for 5 > solid minutes (or more!) during a fall. That puts > thing in a different perspective, to me at least. > > Thanks, > Robert Woolard Received on Wed 19 Mar 2008 11:01:39 AM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |