[meteorite-list] New possible impact structures detected NH. US.

From: m42protosun at aol.com <m42protosun_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:53:05 -0400
Message-ID: <8CABC9ECE8BD0FA-1B74-2260_at_mblk-d48.sysops.aol.com>

Good evening Dirk (MEZ 20:40)
Hello list,
thank you for your comment to possible impact structure in Australia
(Northeast of Henbury).
I have now noticed the altitude funktion of GE (Mouse shifting).
Hunting impact sites was a hobby of me about
nearly 40 years ago, when I was employed in oil prospection companies.
My job was analysing seismic waves on
an IBM 7060 computer which was at that time one of the fastes of the
world. often I found in the waves an echo
of compressed limestone. After a long pause I started again in the 90s
visiting the german structures
Noerdlingern Ries and Steinheimer Becken. At that time it was aloud to
prospect the scene as hobby
mineralogist and I found some very nice cones. Today it is forbidden
and I use GOOGLE.

Now my answer to your comment:
In a desert area a 1 meter higher level around a ring of trees must not
be the a hill. It could be a dune of
sand. Remember! During impact the crater wall inside is hard forced by
shearing forces and the crater center
is forced by hard pressure. After years of weathering the crater will
be filled with sand and everytime when
it becames wet the ring of sheared limestone around the compressede
center takes off the water and the sand
enters the higher porosity. It sinks and build the water reservoir for
the vegetation.So it might be a filled
crater. If you compare it against the small Henburies you will see the
same eff
ect.
My theory is that the Henbury cluster is not the total impact area and
that Boxhole is a crater of the cluster
too. Between both there must be a lot of other impacts. I have put a
ruler from one to the other and on this
line a lot of images look like impact structures. But I'm not im
Australia. Therefore I can only make a
conjecture.

Other "impact structures":
 24?29'34.68"S, 133?13'30.44"E


Now to New Hamshire, US. look at:
 43? 6'42.49"N, 71?11'24.44"W
 43?16'57.90"N, 71?11'6.78"W
 42?54'53.69"N, 71?35'36.35"W
I did not know wether they are or wether they are wellknown.

Tell me please your meaning
Sincerely Uwe


-----Urspr?ngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: drtanuki <drtanuki at yahoo.com>
An: m42protosun at aol.com
Verschickt: Fr., 25. Jul. 2008, 2:04
Thema: Re: [meteorite-list] New possible impact structures detected



Hi Uwe,
   It appears to be a small circular hill surrounded by vegetation. The
center
is higher than the surrounding area and the water drains off of the
sides of the
hill providing more water to support the vegetation (shrubs or trees).
Use your
mouse and move the cursor over the feature and you can see the
elevations as you
move around the feature. Also tilt it an you can see some indication
that it is
about 1 meter above the surrounding circular base. Dirk

   How long have you been looking for impact craters and what start
ed
your
interest? Best of luck!


--- On Fri, 7/25/08, m42protosun at aol.com <m42protosun at aol.com> wrote:

> From: m42protosun at aol.com <m42protosun at aol.com>
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] New possible impact structures detected
> To: drtanuki at yahoo.com
> Date: Friday, July 25, 2008, 2:39 AM
> Hi Dirk, look at 24?27'46.92"S,
> 133?16'9.01"E.
> What do you think is it?
> Uwe
>
>
> -----Urspr?ngliche Mitteilung-----
> Von: drtanuki <drtanuki at yahoo.com>
> An: Mark Ford <mark.ford at ssl.gb.com>; Uwe
> <m42protosun at aol.com>;
> meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Verschickt: Do., 24. Jul. 2008, 12:52
> Thema: Re: [meteorite-list] New possible impact structures
> detected
>
>
>
> Hello Mark, Uwe and List,
> Thank you both for your posts.
> Mark I do not see any evidence for any military activity
> to the
> South. The
> darkened areas around the animal pens are manure and the
> buildings are
> all
> intact.
> The circular "target" that Uwe has found is
> difficult to determine
> just what
> it is because of its size and the poor resolution of the
> image.
> Elevations at
> the site do not indicate a circular depression and tilted
> images only
> reveal
> that is is on a hillslope.
> Mark is correct that the Antarctica image is just too
> poor to tell
> anything.
> Best Regards, Dirk Ross...Tokyo
>
>
> --- On Thu, 7/24/08, Mark Ford <mark.ford at ssl.gb.com
>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Mark Ford <mark.ford at ssl.gb.com>
> > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] New possible impact
> structures detected
> > To: m42protosun at aol.com,
> meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> > Date: Thursday, July 24, 2008, 6:17 PM
> > Hi Uwe,
> >
> > Not sure about the Peru one, it looks like a military
> > training range or similar! - scan to the south and
> there
> > are some burned out building it's like a firin
> g range
> > or similar, so could be a bomb crater?
> >
> > The Antarctica one is difficult to say, as the
> resolution
> > is way too low on google to see any detail, could be
> > anything ice makes all kind of patterns!
> >
> > Best,
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com
> > [mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com]
> On
> > Behalf Of m42protosun at aol.com
> > Sent: 24 July 2008 00:48
> > To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> > Subject: [meteorite-list] New possible impact
> structures
> > detected
> >
> > Good evening list,
> > Using GOOGLE I have found two possible impact
> structures,
> > which are
> > nowhere to be found. Would you please be so kind to
> control
> > my
> > assumption.
> > Peru: 17?34'09.00'' S;
> > 69?40'53.59'' W
> > Antarctica: 80?49'60.00'' S;
> > 126?19'60.00'' E
> >
> > Regards Uwe
> >
> >
>
__________________
______________________________________________________
> > AOL eMail auf Ihrem Handy! Ab sofort k?nnen Sie auch
> > unterwegs Ihre AOL
> > email abrufen. Registrieren Sie sich jetzt kostenlos.
> > ______________________________________________
> > http://www.meteoritecentral.com
> > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> >
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
> >
> > This email and any files transmitted with it are
> > confidential. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please
> > notify us. Email info at ssl.gb.com. You should not copy
> or use
> > this email o
> r attachment(s) for any purpose nor disclose
> > their contents to any other person.
> >
> > GENERAL STATEMENT:
> >
> > Southern Scientific Ltd's computer systems may be
> > monitored and communications carried on them recorded,
> to
> > secure the effective operation of the system and for
> other
> > lawful purposes.
> >
> > Registered address Rectory Farm Rd, Sompting, Lancing,
> W
> > Sussex BN15 0DP. Company No 1800317
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > http://www.meteoritecentral.com
> > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> >
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
> AOL eMail auf Ihrem Handy! Ab sofort k?nnen Sie auch
> unterwegs Ihre AOL=0
D
> email abrufen. Registrieren Sie sich jetzt kostenlos.


________________________________________________________________________
AOL eMail auf Ihrem Handy! Ab sofort k?nnen Sie auch unterwegs Ihre AOL
email abrufen. Registrieren Sie sich jetzt kostenlos.
Received on Fri 25 Jul 2008 02:53:05 PM PDT