[meteorite-list] Space leaders work to replace lunar base withmanned asteroid missions

From: Sterling K. Webb <sterling_k_webb_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:29:51 -0600
Message-ID: <00db01c85b9a$d45e2510$a12f4842_at_ATARIENGINE>

Hi, All,

    The U.S. is already spending an estimated
2.7 to 3.5 Trillion Dollars on a Lunar Base, an
extensive outpost in a very hostile environment.

    The only problem is: it's located in Iraq.


Sterling K. Webb
----------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darren Garrison" <cynapse at charter.net>
To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 8:35 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Space leaders work to replace lunar base
withmanned asteroid missions


http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0801/18avweek/

Moon Stuck
Space leaders work to replace lunar base with manned asteroid missions
PUBLISHED IN AVIATION WEEK & SPACE TECHNOLOGY
RE-PRINTED HERE WITH PERMISSION
Posted: January 18, 2008

BY CRAIG COVAULT

Some of the most influential leaders of the space community are quietly
working
to offer the next U.S. president an alternative to President Bush's "vision
for
space exploration"--one that would delete a lunar base and move instead
toward
manned missions to asteroids along with a renewed emphasis on Earth
environmental spacecraft.

Top U.S. planetary scientists, several astronauts and former NASA division
directors will meet privately at Stanford University on Feb. 12-13 to define
these sweeping changes to the NASA/Bush administration Vision for Space
Exploration (VSE).

Abandoning the Bush lunar base concept in favor of manned asteroid landings
could also lead to much earlier manned flights to Mars orbit, where
astronauts
could land on the moons Phobos or Deimos.

Their goals for a new array of missions also include sending astronauts to
Lagrangian points, 1 million mi. from Earth, where the Earth's and Sun's
gravity
cancel each other out and spacecraft such as replacements for the Hubble
Space
Telescope could be parked and serviced much like Hubble.

The "alternate vision" the group plans to offer would urge far greater
private-sector incentives to make ambitious human spaceflight plans a
reality.

There would also be some different "winners and losers" compared with the
Bush
vision. If the lunar base is deleted, the Kennedy Space Center could lose
additional personnel because there would be fewer Ares V launches and no
lunar
base infrastructure work that had been assigned to KSC. On the other hand,
the
Goddard Space Flight Center and National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
near Washington, along with the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
California,
would gain with the increased space environmental-monitoring goal.

Numerous planetary managers told Aviation Week & Space Technology they now
fear
a manned Moon base and even shorter sorties to the Moon will bog down the
space
program for decades and inhibit, rather than facilitate, manned Mars
operations--the ultimate goal of both the Bush and alternative visions. The
first lunar sortie would be flown by about 2020 under the Bush plan.

If alternative-vision planners have their way, the mission could instead be
flown to an asteroid in about 2025.

Participants in the upcoming meeting contend there's little public
enthusiasm
for a return to the Moon, especially among youth, and that the Bush
administration has laid out grandiose plans but has done little to provide
the
funding to realize them on a reasonable timescale.

Planners say the Bush plan is beginning to crumble, with only companies that
have won major funding still enthusiastic about the existing plan.

"It's becoming painfully obvious that the Moon is not a stepping-stone for
manned Mars operations but is instead a stumbling block," says Robert
Farquhar,
a veteran of planning and operating planetary and deep-space missions.

The prospect of challenging new manned missions to asteroids is drawing far
more
excitement among young people than a "return" (as in going backward) to the
Moon, says Lou Friedman, who heads The Planetary Society, the country's
largest
space interest group.

The society is co-hosting the invitation-only VSE replanning session with
Stanford. A lot of people going to the meeting believe "the Moon is so
yesterday," says Friedman.

"It just does not feel right. And there's growing belief that, at high cost,
it
offers minimal engineering benefit for later manned Mars operations."

Under the alternative VSE, even smaller, individual lunar sorties would be
reduced, or perhaps deleted entirely, says Noel W. Hinners, who had
extensive
Apollo lunar science and system responsibility at Bell Laboratories before
heading all of NASA's science program development. He also led Lockheed
Martin
Spaceflight System.

Hinners believes the group should examine dropping all the lunar sorties to
accelerate the human push to Mars in the revised VSE proposal to the new
administration.

The James Webb Space Telescope, with a 21.3-ft.-dia. mirror, will be
launched in
2013 to one of these "L" points. With little fanfare, it was recently
approved
to carry a lightweight Crew Exploration Vehicle docking system just in case
a
manned CEV has to make a house call a million miles from Earth for emergency
servicing.

A growing corps of scientists, engineers and astronauts are emerging to
argue
for this chance to accelerate manned spaceflight operations outward well
beyond
the Moon--faster toward Mars than can be done by using the Moon as a
stepping-stone only 240,000 mi. away.

"The notion that the Moon could serve as a proving ground for Mars missions
strains credulity," says Farquhar, who holds the Charles A. Lindbergh Chair
for
Aerospace at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. He also was
mission
director for the Applied Physics Laboratory's Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous
mission that was the first to land a spacecraft on an asteroid.

A return to manned Moon operations has become "a bridge too far" in the Bush
administration's VSE, says Wes Huntress, another former planetary mission
manager.

Huntress is director of the Washington-based Carnegie Institution's
Geophysical
Laboratory and had a long career at JPL and NASA headquarters, where he led
NASA
space science development and operations--including the highly successful
Discovery planetary mission series. He's also helping to organize the
Stanford
workshop that will have about several dozen participants, including several
top
NASA and contractor exploration managers.

"There is little left of the 2004 Vision for Space Exploration except the
real
need to retire the space shuttle," he says. "Even this goal is being pursued
with great sacrifice from all other parts of the agency because the
administration has simply not put its money where its mouth is."

"Inadequate NASA budgets are leading to collapse of the VSE Moon focus and
to
incredibly slow progress for the Moon," says Hinners.

"The nation's space enterprise is under great strain even to build Ares I
and
Orion CEV," Huntress stresses. "There are alternate destinations for human
deep-space missions that do not require building a lot of new hardware to
[come
and go between Earth and the Moon]. These are missions to near-Earth
asteroids
or to scout the Sun-Earth Lagrangian points for future space telescope
construction and servicing," he notes.

The Earth-Sun Lagrangian points (also called libration points) are at the
very
edge of the Earth's gravitational well, and a mission would represent a
first
excursion to the limit of Earth's influence in the Solar System--a
significant
step beyond Apollo, says Huntress.

Missions sent to "L" points can stop just there, orbiting only above and
below
the ecliptic plane without any significant use of station-keeping fuel.
Also, L
points offer a much cleaner option for advanced astronomy than the dusty
lunar
surface, where you have to land everything in addition to launching it.

"As the nation seems to be turning to environmental threats to our own
planet, a
mission to a near-Earth asteroid to assess their nature for good or ill
would
also seem to be a real winner," says Huntress.

These stepping-stones would allow for the development of a broader vision of
human spaceflight than simply reinventing Apollo.

Major lunar-related contracts for the Constellation Crew Exploration Vehicle
Orion command ship, a lunar lander design and Ares V launcher have yet to be
awarded, giving the next administration some breathing room in post-Bush
administration VSE contracting.

Some basic asteroid mission design work--part of it volunteer--using the CEV
hardware is already underway at the Johnson Space Center (AW&ST Sept. 25,
2006,
p. 21). Other, more in-depth and long-standing manned asteroid analysis is
underway under International Astronautical Assn. and Smithsonian National
Air
and Space Museum sponsorship.

Scott Hubbard, consulting professor in the Stanford Aeronautics and
Astronautics
Dept., conceived the reassessment meeting. Hubbard was previously the
director
of NASA Ames Research Center and, before that, NASA Mars program director.
"We
have planned this invitation-only workshop to elicit frank and open
discussion
about the future of the 'vision' as the administration changes," he says.

"The Stanford workshop will address a broad range of issues touching on many
elements of space exploration. The attendees will discuss the balance
between
space science and human exploration, the need for continuing and enhancing
Earth
science observations, the relative utility of humans and robotics, and
progress
or impediments to human exploration of Mars, asteroids and the Moon," says
Hubbard. "In addition, the workshop will discuss the status of access to
space
and the emerging entrepreneurial space industry.

"This is the kind of debate that will go on--beyond whether a lunar base
really
makes sense. But manned asteroid missions first--ahead of a lunar base--are
drawing strong attention," he says. Hubbard and Friedman are co-hosting the
event, along with former astronaut Kathy Thornton, associate dean of the
University of Virginia's Science, Technology and Society Dept. Thornton flew
on
four space shuttle missions, including the initial critical repair of the
Hubble
Space Telescope in 1993.

The alternative vision would also include far greater private-sector
incentives
for participation at all levels, an area public surveys cite as very
important.
Missions to asteroids and Lagrangian points, for example, are likely to
carry
along Bigelow-type commercial inflatable modules. A recent informal space
program survey by The New York Times found substantial public frustration
about
NASA's doing what entrepreneurs could do better.

Under the alternative concepts, astronauts using an upgraded CEV would
initially
be sent on long-duration missions, not to the Moon, but to land on asteroids
where they would sample terrain perhaps more ancient than the Moon's. These
visits would also help develop concepts for diverting such near-Earth
objects,
should they threaten a potentially devastating impact on Earth.

Although it may be hundreds of years before used operationally, an emergency
asteroid diversion would be "the ultimate 'green mission'--one that could
save a
large portion of the Earth from impact destruction," says Friedman.

To reinforce that point, he notes that on Jan. 30, a 150-ft.-long asteroid
will
pass close to Mars. The asteroid visit and Lagrangian mission concepts would
use
much of the same CEV Ares I and Ares V heavy-lift booster infrastructure,
but in
ways that would be much faster stepping-stones to Mars than developing a
manned
lunar base. Asteroid and Lagrangian point missions would each last several
weeks
or months. Both the libration points and asteroids would be about 1 million
mi.
from Earth, requiring operations more like much longer trips to Mars at
least
40-100 million mi. away.

Robotic options for all mission elements also will be reviewed, and one
working
group will be devoted to better defining manned versus robotic tradeoffs.

Another issue is international participation.

Aviation Week discussed an unrelated European International Space Station
topic
with NASA Administrator Mike Griffin last week, who in comments aside also
addressed the basic Moon/Mars issues between the U.S. and Europe.

"A large portion of the scientific community in the U.S. also prefers Mars
over
the Moon," he acknowledged. But "interest in the Moon is driven by goals in
addition to and beyond the requirements of the science community. It is
driven
by the imperatives that ensue from a commitment to become a spacefaring
society,
not primarily by scientific objectives, though such objectives do indeed
constitute a part of the overall rationale.

"We continue to experience intense international interest concerning our
plans
for lunar exploration," Griffin told Aviation Week.

With Frank Morring, Jr., in Washington.

This story appears in the Jan. 21 issue of Aviation Week & Space Technology,
p.
24

______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Sun 20 Jan 2008 02:29:51 PM PST