[meteorite-list] Thin Sections of Carancas Meteorite Chondritic or not
From: Mr EMan <mstreman53_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 20:56:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <116187.38355.qm_at_web51009.mail.re2.yahoo.com> As to what Rob has raised--I did see several chondrules in the photos. This looks much like the friable L;s we have seen and contains slickensides which would tend to make it a monomyct breccia. However these large metal blebs are intriguing and might make this an anomalous stone. I didn't see any thing in the photos which appeared to be a true shock vein, only the slicken sides. However for there to be large blebs/clasts of iron and or olivine in the stone it must have had a very shocked history with possibly injected components of an iron or pallasite. If so, this might explain the initial declaration that this was a "chondritic pallasite". Elton --- Rob Matson <mojave_meteorites at cox.net> wrote: > "Based only on the images of the exteriors, I would > consider the specimens very unlikely to be chondritic. But there~are~ some chondrite-like features in the thin sections (though I wouldn't call them unambiguously chondrules). The rims are indistinct, there are no shock veins visible, and the interference colors don't seem quite right. I'll forward the images to a few experts to get their opinions, but if this > is a chondrite, it would seem to be a metamorphised, > highly brecciated one." > --Rob Received on Sun 07 Oct 2007 11:56:33 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |