[meteorite-list] Did a Collision Cause Comet 17P/Holmes'MysteriousOutburst?
From: Jerry <grf2_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 17:08:54 -0500 Message-ID: <DFA858EB4C45410CB43E62FF8ED83240_at_Notebook> WOW. Glad you reposted this! Jerry Flaherty ----- Original Message ----- From: <lebofsky at lpl.arizona.edu> To: <lebofsky at lpl.arizona.edu> Cc: "Jerry" <grf2 at verizon.net>; "Meteorite Mailing List" <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>; "Ron Baalke" <baalke at zagami.jpl.nasa.gov> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 12:24 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Did a Collision Cause Comet 17P/Holmes'MysteriousOutburst? > Hi List: > > I am trying this again since my previouys forward did not appear to go > through. > > On November 13, this newly-discovered asteroid (only about 20 meters > diameter) will pass within 2 Earth radii of the CENTER of the Earth (that > is close). It will be 9th magnitude (about 50-100 times too faint to see > with the naked eye), but show be observable with a small telescope (if it > is night where you are when it comes by and you know were to look). > > Go to the cfa.harvard site for coordiantes, etc. I can interpret columns > if you are interested. > > I am sure there will be more about this in the coming days. > > LArry > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Alan W Harris <awharris at spacescience.org> >> Date: November 8, 2007 5:15:19 PM MST >> To: "Peter Birtwhistle" <peter at birtwhi.demon.co.uk> >> Cc: mpml at yahoogroups.com >> Subject: Re: {MPML} 2007 VN84 incoming >> >> 2007 VN84 is significant in that it not only comes closer, it is much >> bigger, around 20 m in diameter, compared to 2004 FU162 only about >> 1/3 that >> size. Based on our recent population estimates, we expect an object >> the >> size of 2004 FU162 to pass within a couple Earth radii about once a >> year, >> and to actually impact (actually, blow up in the upper atmosphere) >> about >> once in five years, so the only thing unusual about 2004 FU162 is >> that we >> saw it as it passed by. 2007 VN84, on the other hand, is so large >> that we >> expect omething that big to come as close as 2 radii only about >> once in 20 >> years, so it is a remarkable event in itself, in addition to the >> fact that >> it was discovered and can be watched flying by. Congratulations to >> Richard >> Kowalski and the Catalina Sky Survey. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Alan >> >> P.S. I second his request and interest for a lightcurve, but it >> will be a >> real challeng on account of its rate of motion. Plenty bright >> enough, but >> really truckin'. >> >> At 03:57 PM 11/8/2007, Peter Birtwhistle wrote: >> >Take a look at MPEC 2007-V69 just announced... >> > >> >http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/mpec/K07/K07V69.html >> > >> >"The minimum distance from the geocenter is 0.000081 AU (1.89 Earth >> >radii) on Nov 13.844 UT" >> > >> >just beating the previous record close approach of 2004 FU162, but >> >this time we have 5 days lead time. >> > >> >Peter > >> >> ******************************************************************* >> Alan W. Harris >> Senior Research Scientist >> Space Science Institute >> 4603 Orange Knoll Ave. Phone: 818-790-8291 >> La Canada, CA 91011-3364 email: awharris at SpaceScience.org >> ******************************************************************* >> >> >> __._,_.___ >> Messages in this topic (0)Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic >> Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Polls | Members | Calendar >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >> Posts to this list or information found within may be freely used, >> with the stipulation that MPML and the originating author are cited >> as the source of the information. > > Received on Fri 09 Nov 2007 05:08:54 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |