[meteorite-list] Since Scale Cubes are a topic today
From: Drake <monel_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 17:29:00 -0500 Message-ID: <B8B8AA88753340638ECEEBC5168C0616_at_DrakePC> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sterling K. Webb" <sterling_k_webb at sbcglobal.net> To: "Mike Bandli" <fuzzfoot at comcast.net>; "'Delbert Waterbury'" <paseclipse at yahoo.com>; <Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 4:20 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Since Scale Cubes are a topic today > Hi, All > > I hate to sound a sour note, but these "artifacts" are > for SCALE, not measurement. I think it's wonderful > that folks make them accurate to +/- 0.001 inch or > millimeter, out of materials with low coefficients of > expansion, and so forth, but that is purely an exercise > in personal perfectionism. > <snipped for brevity> Actualy, I made them to +/- 0.00015 ;-) But your are right, scale is not a NIST traceable measurement. It's more of a concept. But still... you can't be too accurate. :-) Drake "A rock pile ceases to be a pile of rocks, the moment one contemplates it and envisions a cathedral." Drake "Doc" Damer?u L3CC Member www.nepra.com www.rocketmaterials.org http://home.sprynet.com/~monel/ Received on Thu 08 Nov 2007 05:29:00 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |