[meteorite-list] Could it be....
From: Razvan Andrei <asean-1_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:33:33 +0200 Message-ID: <008201c73ff7$125fd1d0$80db2454_at_asean1> > Bernd Pauli wrote: > The earliest email I have saved is from Thu, 20 Mar 1997 and it was > written > by no less a person than Frank ... Frank Stroik for those who still > remember > him. Hi list, My earliest mail saved is from Sun, May 11, 1997, also written by Frank Stroik on vesicles and vugs in chondrules. I guess I joined the list around that date. The header says 'archive/latest/331'. The message is interesting and I will copy it here... Best Regards, Andrei >From - Sun May 11 04:55:32 1997 Date: Sat, 10 May 1997 10:28:13 -0600 (MDT) From: fes at UWYO.EDU Subject: Re: Tying up some loose ends. To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com Cc: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Mailing-List: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> archive/latest/331 X-Mozilla-Status: 001d A few people on this list have asked me questions, and I have yet not responded. Today, I will do my best to answer these questions, as I will be out of town for three weeks, as of tommorow. These are questions that the entire list may be interested in reading the answer. I recieved a question a while back, about vesicles, and vugs in chondrules. Bascily the gentleman wanted to know why I said " By definition chondrules cannot have vugs/vesicles". Here now is my expalnation, and I apologize to the person for the delay. My answer is derived from an article written for a book written in 1983 entitled "Chondrules and Their Origins"(published by the Lunar and Planetary Institiute, edited by Elbert A. King). Basicly the definition of chondrule as of 1983, and 1988(a paper published by John Wasson), is an object that has been melted, and cooled rapidly, thus creating small and fine grained aggregates, and in some cases quenched glass. These are spherical to subspherical, and may contain lithic fragments. Now, anytime silicate material is cooled rapidly, the crystals tend to be small, as well as the possible formation of "volcanic glass". The mode of formation of chondrules precludes vesicles/vugs based on this, as most gas was probobly removed due to volitization when the material was initialy heated, thereby not allowing to be incorporated in to the rapidly cooling silicates. Here on Earth, I am currently unaware of any igneous bodies, that have been cooled rapidly(i.e. obsidian deposits) that contain any appreciable gas bubbles. Pumice is in a sense volcanic glass that has cooled rapidly, and contains gas in it, but in having this property, it has little structural rigidity, and breaks down readily in relativly short geologic time. So based on the above information, it seems that that chondrules with vesicle/vugs are not likely to occur. However, I am aware that there are still many debates on what exactly a chondrule is, and how to define them. I choose the above definiton, because I am not a chondrule expert, and prefer to follow what seems plausible as realistic classification. I am positive, either right now, or sometime soon the above idea may change, but I will use the above definition until I see otherwise. One more quick comment. I have to upgrade my reference above, as it is somewhat incomplete. The references I need have been checked out of the Library here, and I can't properly site until they come back. I will post the reference, with page numbers when I get back. I had a question on the E-chondrite Earth. I will attempt to explain this paper in as much detail I can(M. Javoy, "The integral enstatite chondrite model of the earth" Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 22, No. 16, Pages 2219-2222, August 15, 1995.) It should be kept in mind that this is an alternative to the conventional earth model that says ordinary chondritic material is what the earth formed from. The basic idea of the article is that E-chondrites match the earth in stable isotope, and redox characteristics. Redox is term used to denote a chemical reaction adding or taking away oxygen. By looking at these properties, models can be made to explain the differentiation of the earths mantle, meaning why the elements are found the way they are in the mantle. The mantle is thought to be homogeneous based on elements found in E,C, and Ordinary chondrites. Using simple chemistry, the depth at which different elements would be found in the mantle is used to try and make a picture of the mantle's makeup. The author of this paper indicates this may be wrong, and the mantle is heterogoneous. The author attempts to explain this by using e-chondrites as building blocks of planet earth. EH- chondrites are the material that is used in the modeling, because it appears to have the closest elemental, and isotopic compositions of the earth. The author explains in some detail the various effects of EH material in the earth, to show it to be feasible. The main point to remember is that the mantle may not be as homgeneous as previously thought, and that it may in fact hold two very different elemental compositions. I should state that no one has sampled the mantle directly, and there is alot of room for interpritation. Basicly this model helps to explain how metal migrated to the core of the earth, and the compositional differences that are in the mantle(this is based upon thermodynamic equations,and theory, and little on actual specimen anaylisis). Also it gives a more rational explanation for oxidize Fe. Instead of trying to use "ad-hoc" change in the type of material being accumulated to explain this, the Fe in EH-chondrites are close to this state, therefore the process is much simpler to explain, and therfore better. I hope this enlighten a few of you. I could explain the article in much greater detail, but that would require more writing, more than most would like to do in this format. Please, if you have any questions, let me know, and I will answer them when I get back. Frank Stroik _______________________________________________________________ Vodafone scaneaza automat toate mesajele impotriva virusilor folosind Trend Micro VirusWall. Vodafone automatically scans all messages for viruses using Trend Micro VirusWall. _______________________________________________________________ Nota: Este posibil ca produsul Trend Micro VirusWall sa nu detecteze toti virusii noi sau toate variantele lor. Va rugam sa luati in considerare ca exista un risc de fiecare data cind deschideti fisiere atasate si ca Vodafone Romania nu este responsabila pentru orice prejudiciu cauzat de decizia dvs. Disclaimer: It is possible that the Trend Micro VirusWall product may not be able to detect all new viruses and variants. Please be aware that there is a risk involved whenever opening e-mail attachments to your computer and that Vodafone Romania is not responsible for any damages caused by your decision to do so. Received on Wed 24 Jan 2007 03:33:33 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |