[meteorite-list] Irons DON'T form Fusion Crust's - yes they DO

From: Dave Freeman mjwy <dfreeman_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 13:56:00 -0700
Message-ID: <45A15E60.3080209_at_fascination.com>

>
>
>phenomenological
>
It this really a word? Sounds like a George Bush word.
DF


Matthias B?rmann wrote:

>I agree. But using an expression (also a scientific one) in a
>phenomenological manner we should take care to avoid a contradiction (or
>even tensions) between the phenomenological and the scientific dimension.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Darren Garrison" <cynapse at charter.net>
>To: "Matthias B?rmann" <majbaermann at web.de>
>Cc: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
>Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 8:26 PM
>Subject: Re: Re: [meteorite-list] Irons DON'T form Fusion Crust's - yes they
>DO
>
>
>On Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:17:25 +0100, you wrote:
>
>
>
>>But it doesn't hit the point regarding meteorites. "Glassy" evokes the
>>impression of something shiny, very smooth, mirror-like. But as we all now
>>
>>
>
>But the "laymen" use of the term isn't the scientific one. "Glassy" means
>something that cooled quickly enough that it didn't have time to crystalize
>and
>is instead, on the atomic level, an amorphous mess.
>
>______________________________________________
>Meteorite-list mailing list
>Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/meteorite-list/attachments/20070107/152ab1f3/attachment.html>
Received on Sun 07 Jan 2007 03:56:00 PM PST