[meteorite-list] Another eBay Correction - "Fossil" NWA 2828

From: Greg Hupe <gmhupe_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:19:35 -0500
Message-ID: <0bfc01c73202$46f7b230$cc135c18_at_Gregor>

Hi Mark, Dean and List,

Boy, I should have started from scratch when I re-loaded my previously
unsold eBay auctions of NWA 2828 "Fossil" EL3 meteorite. I've already
corrected the TKW of 2828 and referenced "pairings". Now I notice I
overlooked changing "Paleo" to "Fossil".

Back to the revise button...

Chalk it up to too much going on and too many changes! I hope I did not
sound forward when pointing out "...my previous email with reference to the
NWA 2828 abstract..." If so, I apologize for any perceived aggression, it
was not meant that way.

Best regards,
Greg

====================
Greg Hupe
The Hupe Collection
NaturesVault (eBay)
gmhupe at tampabay.rr.com
www.LunarRock.com
IMCA 3163
====================


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark" <mafer at imagineopals.com>
To: "dean bessey" <deanbessey at yahoo.com>
Cc: "meteoritelist" <Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] PALEO Meteorite||||Was Very Rare NWA2828


> Hi Dean and List
>
> Dean, I do agree. Paleo-anything has an anthropomorphic connotation about
> it. Relic has a manmade feel to it. Fossil denotes something once extent,
> now dead and what we have are it's mineralized bones and traces.
>
> Prius means before, maybe that would be less of a problem.
>
> Mark Ferguson
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "dean bessey" <deanbessey at yahoo.com>
> To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 8:41 PM
> Subject: [meteorite-list] PALEO Meteorite||||Was Very Rare NWA2828
>
>
>> --- Matt Morgan <mmorgan at mhmeteorites.com> wrote:
>>> How long does it take to be considered "paleo"? All
>>> the means is "old".
>>> Please shed some light on this for me...
>>> Matt Morgan
>>>
>> I dont think that "Paleo" is a proper way to describe
>> them as these meteorites are not paleolithic.
>> Paleolithic is an era starting just before mesolithic
>> (13,000 or somewhere around that years ago - I cant
>> remember exactly) going back to the dawn of man which
>> is around 2.5 million years ago.
>> Well there is dispute when the first man showed up but
>> it certainly wasnt 110 million years ago like the Lake
>> murrey "paleo" meteorite which is a Cretaceous
>> meteorite - not a paleolithic one.
>> "Relic", which has also been used is a much better
>> word to describe these meteorites.
>> Cheers
>> DEAN
>> www.meteoriteshop.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>> ______________________________________________
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
Received on Sat 06 Jan 2007 09:19:35 PM PST