[meteorite-list] PALEO Meteorite||||Was Very Rare NWA2828

From: Mark <mafer_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 20:55:55 -0500
Message-ID: <004401c731fe$f84f28a0$01fea8c0_at_maf>

Hi Dean and List

Dean, I do agree. Paleo-anything has an anthropomorphic connotation about
it. Relic has a manmade feel to it. Fossil denotes something once extent,
now dead and what we have are it's mineralized bones and traces.

Prius means before, maybe that would be less of a problem.

Mark Ferguson
----- Original Message -----
From: "dean bessey" <deanbessey at yahoo.com>
To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 8:41 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] PALEO Meteorite||||Was Very Rare NWA2828


> --- Matt Morgan <mmorgan at mhmeteorites.com> wrote:
>> How long does it take to be considered "paleo"? All
>> the means is "old".
>> Please shed some light on this for me...
>> Matt Morgan
>>
> I dont think that "Paleo" is a proper way to describe
> them as these meteorites are not paleolithic.
> Paleolithic is an era starting just before mesolithic
> (13,000 or somewhere around that years ago - I cant
> remember exactly) going back to the dawn of man which
> is around 2.5 million years ago.
> Well there is dispute when the first man showed up but
> it certainly wasnt 110 million years ago like the Lake
> murrey "paleo" meteorite which is a Cretaceous
> meteorite - not a paleolithic one.
> "Relic", which has also been used is a much better
> word to describe these meteorites.
> Cheers
> DEAN
> www.meteoriteshop.com
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Sat 06 Jan 2007 08:55:55 PM PST