[meteorite-list] some Japanese researchers question US Colorado fall
From: Chris Peterson <clp_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:33:00 -0700 Message-ID: <068901c7303f$86f8e580$2721500a_at_bellatrix> I think it's extremely unlikely that this was a natural object. The location, velocity, and time(http://www.cloudbait.com/science/fireball20070104.html) are precisely as expected for the 29679 SL-4 rocket body. Also, if you've seen the video caught by news helicopters, this really looks nothing like a normal meteor. It is fragmenting into hundreds, maybe thousands of pieces- as you would expect for a highly inhomogeneous object. This is fragmenting far more than you see even in meteors with shallow paths that break apart (Peekskill, our Colorado Oct 1 event, etc). There is a report of debris on the ground in Wyoming; it will be interesting to see if that gets confirmed. Chris ***************************************** Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "drtanuki" <drtanuki at yahoo.com> To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 1:18 PM Subject: [meteorite-list] some Japanese researchers question US Colorado fall > Dear List, > The is some word filtering through the Japanese > network that the Colorado fall may or may NOT have > been rocket debris and there is still a chance that it > may be a meteorite. Sorry I cannot go into detail > because of the nature of the network. > So, if I were in Colorado I would pack my bags and > head to out. Best in recovery, Dirk...Tokyo Received on Thu 04 Jan 2007 03:33:00 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |