[meteorite-list] Dave Shiflett-- no fan of the brenham

From: Sterling K. Webb <sterling_k_webb_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 01:13:48 -0600
Message-ID: <009601c72fcf$e252a030$a925e146_at_ATARIENGINE>

Hi,

    As to what is on the minds of the "hairdo's,"
er, I mean, the reporters, that's anybody's guess.
Maybe a hint can be found in the little blurb on
the KCET video site, where this segment is
described: "Adam Rogers finds a meteorite in
Kansas." Is that the best description of the
"news" story? Say, didn't that Arnold guy
actually "find" those meteorites? Details,
mere details...
    Where were those headlines in the 1940's that
read: "Edward R. Murrow finds Luftwaffe in Skies
over London"? Or "Walter Cronkite Finds War in
Vietnam"? The "story" is supposed to be about
"the story," fellah.
    Editors? What editors? TV has only producers,
not editors.
    Kudos to Steve and Geoff for their successful
ju-jitsu in getting as much of the reality into the piece
as they did. It's a performance skill, and they
performed the job very well.
    Encore, encore.


Sterling K. Webb
------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: <MeteorHntr at aol.com>
To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Cc: <geoking at notkin.net>
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 1:11 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Dave Shiflett-- no fan of the brenham


> Dave and all,
>
> No, the big rock did not sell yet.
>
> And I am pretty sure the TV show that the story is supposed to
> be quoting did not state that it "sold for a million dollars," only
> that it is "worth about a million dollars." I just think the reporter
> got his facts wrong.
>
> Imagine that, a reporter getting their facts wrong.
>
> I did count 3 errors in the Travel Channel show. There are a
> couple errors in the Wired Magazine article. And I think the
> Wired Science TV show got it pretty close, although I would
> argue the finer details of some of the points in the show. I am
> not even sure if any one of the many newspaper stories this last
> 15 months has got it 100% correct.
>
> Newsweek had a ONE LINE quote in their Nov. 21, 2005 issue
> on the big Brenham Kansas find, and you would think that they
> could at least get that right, right?
>
> Well, they got the one quote from me correct, but then they
> credited the quote to: "Professional meteorite hunter Steve
> Arnold, on his 1,400-pound find in Arkansas..."
>
> OK, I guess an argument in their defense could be made that
> "Kansas" can be found inside the word "Arkansas" so they
> didn't get it all that wrong.
>
> Reporters have a funny phobia of actually letting people they
> interview proof read their stories. So virtually every story ever
> printed or broadcasted in every article or program gets some
> of their facts wrong.
>
> And what you ask are these reporter's editors doing? I don't
> know, I ask the same question.
>
> Steve Arnold, P.M.H.
>
> ***********
>
> In a message dated 1/2/2007 10:56:05 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> _dfreeman at fascination.com_ (mailto:dfreeman at fascination.com) writes:
> "It won't bring as much as an earlier find: a 1,400-pound space rock
> that resembles a massive, slightly rotting yam. Ugly is only skin deep,
> however. This monstrosity sold for a cool million."
>
> So, I didn't know the "rotten yam" had sold, is that true?
>
> I like yams.
> Dave F.
>
> **************
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
Received on Thu 04 Jan 2007 02:13:48 AM PST