[meteorite-list] The New Jersey Object
From: Sterling K. Webb <sterling_k_webb_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:58:02 -0600 Message-ID: <004201c74632$e6b21c90$5c26e146_at_ATARIENGINE> Hi, Jeff, > drag the image to the URL address bar... Thanks for what is, to me, a new trick. Works fine and makes the pictures big enough and clear enough to see the surface features, which makes it clear that the chances this is a meteorite very small indeed. For example, it seems that the edges of those depressions that might be regmaglypts are very sharp. Atmospheric ablation never produces a sharp edge anywhere and never around a depression it's ablating out. There are "parallel" grooves, but they're oriented in patches which show no general orientation to each other. Some adjacent sets of grooves met at right angles to each other. There's one double groove that makes an angled turn! The Universe is surprising, but for this to be a real meteorite is too much of a surprise to ask for. Sterling K. Webb ---------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Kuyken" <info at meteorites.com.au> To: <cynapse at charter.net>; <mineral at optonline.net> Cc: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 6:45 AM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] The New Jersey Object Hey Darren, The pics are larger but just shrunk to fit on the page. You can either save the image and view it normally on your computer as you might any other pic or even drag the image to the URL address bar which will enlarge it. Cheers, Jeff P.S. I remain unconvinced at this stage until someone "meteoritically qualified" says different! ;-) ----- Original Message ----- From: Darren Garrison To: mineral at optonline.net Cc: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 3:52 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] The New Jersey Object On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:27:34 +0000 (GMT), you wrote: >For anybody intersted in seeing the pictures that I took of the NJO, I created a short webpage of the images. >They are raw from the camera, so they might take a little time to load. Thanks, Derek. > >www.njfossils.net/newjerseyobject.html Thanks for poting them, but unless you only took 269x202 pictures, these are just small thumbnail images. Do you have full sized ones? And do you have an opinion on meteorite or not? ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Thu 01 Feb 2007 01:58:02 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |