[meteorite-list] Article on artificial meteorites
From: Sterling K. Webb <sterling_k_webb_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 01:39:54 -0600 Message-ID: <0a1601c84924$d6d17280$b64fe146_at_ATARIENGINE> Hi, Darren, List, In thinking about the "likelihood" of organisms from one planet gaining a foothold on another planet, there is one very obvious point in game-theory that is being ignored here. Let's say some evil force is determined to kill you. You foil each and every assassin they send against you, but they have an endless supply of fanatical attackers. To live, you have to be successful EVERY time; they only have to be successful ONCE. Whether it's a case of bringing life to a lifeless world, or bringing a new form of life well-suited to expansion onto a world that already has lifeforms, the "invader" only has to succeed ONCE. And if the introduced lifeform is NOT well-suited to expand on the world it "invades," then no number of "invasions" will succeed. Since you can never demonstrate a ZERO potential of biotic transfer, you can never prove its impossibility, for the simple reason that it need only happen ONCE to change an entire world. "Reasoning" on the basis of what is reasonable is always risky. For example, it was obvious that, after a half billion years of the evolution of land animals, the 170 million year dominance of the dinosauria would eventually lead to intelligent life. It was the only reasonable thing. ONE little accident, that's all, just ONE, and we're starting over again, with nothing more promising than tree rats. It's a hell of a thing. Sterling K. Webb ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Darren Garrison" <cynapse at charter.net> To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 12:34 AM Subject: [meteorite-list] Article on artificial meteorites I think some information on this has been posted before, but I don't know if all of this has. Of note: "The dolomite did not acquire a fusion crust. Instead, the surface exposed to the heat of re-entry burned off. This could point to one reason why we have not yet found a sedimentary martian meteorite - it lacks that tell-tale black fusion crust that meteorite hunters look for. "It will be difficult to recognize them," says Brack. "There is no obvious sign or feature that they are meteorites. The only way would be to have a mass spectrometer to measure the oxygen isotopes 16, 17, and 18, as well as nickel, manganese, and chromium, because Martian silicates are expected to be enriched in these elements." " http://www.astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=2567&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0 ______________________________________________ http://www.meteoritecentral.com Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Fri 28 Dec 2007 02:39:54 AM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |