[meteorite-list] What is the ugly black meteorite Steve posted about?
From: STARSANDSCOPES at aol.com <STARSANDSCOPES_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 11:40:44 EDT Message-ID: <cf8.148c6eab.33e7497c_at_aol.com> Hi List, I sold Steve the 118 gr. ugly black meteorite he posted about yesterday. Who would of guessed it would of started this. He only has 118 gr of what is still unclassified so I can't figure it was a sales ad he was posting. A little over a month ago I posted the list about this ugly weathered meteorite found in seemingly large quantity in several large Moroccan lots I had purchased. It is very distinctive and would stand out for any one who owns some already. I am not suggesting a self pairing exercise in mass, but I would like to know how much is out there and help list members dial in on some real nice material they may of over looked. It has been sent for classification but results are not back yet. If it were something worth while, other list members may want to compare the quantity they own against the long process of having theirs classified. I expressed this thought to Steve and I think he was trying to restart discussion about this material. http://www.meteorite.com/meteorite-gallery/meteorites-feat_frame.htm This link is my Gallery hosted by Meteorite Times (The Meteorite online Magazine, Not the Gambling site!) If you go to "Features" and then "Perfect Chondrule" you will see the material in macro (cut and uncut), close up and some very cool micrographs. In the hand, this meteorite looks just black, devoid of chondrules, like an IMB, but up close with Xpol light, the chondrules really pop out and are quite plentiful. There are also some lavender colored glassy chondrules that have raised some interest because of the double terminated crystals (I sent the best example to Alan Rubin). Magnetic attraction is very low. I cut a slice the same thickness as a slice of a classified LL meteorite and put a magnet in between. The LL will pull the magnet off of this meteorite. I regret referring to this material as "Perfect Chondrule" because it is obviously self serving. I asked Paul (Meteorite Times)in a non serious way, "What would the perfect chondrule look like?" and offered some of these micrographs. In subsequent emails, the name stuck and as it has not been named or numbered, I continued to refer to it that way. So What Steve posted about was "Perfect Chondrule" material and although he said he could see no chondrules, there are many chondrules! Tom Phillips ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour Received on Sun 05 Aug 2007 11:40:44 AM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |