[meteorite-list] living near a strewfield
From: joseph_town_at_att.net <joseph_town_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed Oct 25 12:07:37 2006 Message-ID: <102420060511.16331.453DA07300067C7B00003FCB21602807410299019BA1089F0A9C0106_at_att.net> Hi EMan and list, So a strewnfield does not exist until proven, regardless of the fact that little or no effort has been made in the investigation of a given fall/find? I can see that. Still, I'd like to believe they're there just as any cold find sets a hunter in motion. Bill -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Mr EMan <mstreman53_at_yahoo.com> > Me thinks we are stretching the definition and/or > conventional use of the term "strewn field". A single > stone-2-3 stones do not a strewn field make unless > there is compelling evidence that there was a wide > spread peppering of stones. > > We are talking meteorite showers here. Park Forest, > Allende, Odessa, Canyon Diablo, Holbrook, Johnstown, > Bilingua, Gold Basin, Tagish Lake, etc.. Have Strewn > fields based on direct recovery.(forgive any > mispellings cheap spell check) > > Peekskill, theoretically has a strewn field with 3 or > more Peaks owing to sequential fragmentation--even > though only one stone was recovered: over 75 fragments > were seen to fall away from the swarm... > > New Orleans, Syllicaga, Westfield, etc...nada > > The whole issue of strewn field was based on a > mathematical distribution ellipse that early > researchers used to forecast an area to concentrate > searching. To draw this elipse one needs technically 4 > or more stones plotted less than. The ellipse is > refined as more stones are recovered and plotted. a > well defined ellipse(30+) typically means 90 95-98% of > the time at least 95% of the distribution will fall > within the ellipse. > > Elton > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Tue 24 Oct 2006 01:11:16 AM PDT |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |