[meteorite-list] Chondrule formation mechanism (Info Please)
From: Rob McCafferty <rob_mccafferty_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sat Oct 21 20:33:47 2006 Message-ID: <20061022003345.91309.qmail_at_web50909.mail.yahoo.com> Hi list What I have ben able to find personally on chondrule formation is rather sketchy. Even the otherwise comprehensive Encyclopedia of Meteorites by O. Richard Norton seems to skim over the mechanism in a paragraph. It's almost as if there is something which defies explanation and scientists abhor that more than nature abhors a vacuum. The "slow cooling followed by a rapid quenching" period is that which interests me most. I would dearly like to know where to find the most up-to-date theories on chondrul formation. I know about the R-R Lyrae heating, timescales and frequecies for newly forming stars. I need theory of protostellar nebula. Maybe Nebula density/stellar distance formula. The conditions in which and the timescale in which these 0.1- 3mm chondules formed. Contact off list if you wish. I need this information to assist me with a theory I have, the information for which comes from branches of science so diverse, that their relevance has not been realised. It is only by serendipity that I make the connection. My thoughts will appear here first (though I will ruthlessly hunt down and murder anyone who tries to plagarise my theory, hehe) Rob McCafferty --- Darren Garrison <cynapse_at_charter.net> wrote: > On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 16:41:48 -0700 (PDT), you wrote: > > >> Chondrule textures depend on the extent of > melting > >> of the chondrule precursor- material when cooling > > >> starts. > > > >Kind of begs the question - chodrules formed by > >collision, which causes melt - consider if one > started > >from a steady molten state > > > >>If "viable nuclei" > > > >I wonder what these "viable nuclei" are? viable > cystal > >nuclei=Chondrules? > > How things appear to be (without trying to refer to > chemical/minerological > details that are beyond my level of knowledge) is > that what became chondrules > started out as "fluff" that slowly accumulated from > the solar nebula, like you > mentioned earlier. I imagine something like > snowflakes, or dust-bunnies. > Something fragile and irregular filled with empty > spaces. Then, something (and > there is no consensus on what that "something" was) > heated those > dust-bunnies/snowflakes up to the point where they > melted-- and in a > microgravity environment surface tension pulled them > into little spheres. The > "viable nuclei" means parts of that original fluff > that didn't fully melt and > became seeds for the new minerals to grow on. > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Received on Sat 21 Oct 2006 08:33:45 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |