[meteorite-list] Rare Meteorite Cutting Material
From: Dave <david.carothers_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed Oct 18 17:44:15 2006 Message-ID: <26747719.4780681161205973060.JavaMail.root_at_vms061.mailsrvcs.net> Greg, If you converted grams and kilos to Bessey Specks you wouldn't have that problem. :-) Dave >Hi Martin, > >hehe. Good idea but I wouldn't wish that kind of problem on anyone. I do get >strange looks from people when at a restaurant or bar when I talk about a >"gram of this or a kilo of that" while with friends even worse when I am on >the cell phone talking to a client. The eavesdroppers usually do not believe >you when you explain you are talking about meteorites. The typical reply is, >"What da heck is a meteor stone, sounds like a code for that funny dust the >kids getted whacked out on!". > >Best regards, >Greg > >==================== >Greg Hupe >The Hupe Collection >NaturesVault (eBay) >gmhupe_at_tampabay.rr.com >IMCA 3163 >==================== > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Martin Altmann" <altmann_at_meteorite-martin.de> >To: "'Greg Hupe'" <gmhupe_at_tampabay.rr.com>; ><meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com> >Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 2:46 PM >Subject: AW: [meteorite-list] Rare Meteorite Cutting Material > > >Well Greg, > >send the lunar dust to your competitors in foreign countries. >If the customs officer will ask them, what this white powder in those zip >bags should be, and they grin and state: "Moon dust, man.", >they will have a lot of fun. > >Buckleboo! >Martin > >-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- >Von: meteorite-list-bounces_at_meteoritecentral.com >[mailto:meteorite-list-bounces_at_meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Greg >Hupe >Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2006 20:32 >An: E.P. Grondine >Cc: meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com >Betreff: [meteorite-list] Rare Meteorite Cutting Material > >Dear Ed and List Members, > >Ed wrote: >There's a lot of lunar and Martian dust being created by slicing NWAs, and >it might as well be put to a very good use." > >I have cutting dust from several of my planetary meteorites I have cut, ones > >either from my own discoveries or from purchases from other people's finds. >I used completely cleaned saws and/or polishing equipment prior to cutting >and/or polishing so the material is as pure as it can be considering the >sawing and polishing contaminants. I also have cutting/polishing material >from just about every rare meteorite (i.e. brachinite, angrite, diogenite, >olivine diogenite, EL3, etc.) I have cut. > >If anyone is interested in some quantities of any of this material, please >contact me off list for an inventory of what I have and how many grams of >each you would like. If I sell a large amount to a dealer or collector, I >will not offer the same material in large quantities to others as to not >create a competing environment for the person who first acquired said >material in quantity. I will offer smaller amounts in the glass tubes like I > >already do to collectors however if I choose, if I have any of the material >left. > >I am also open to suggestions as Ed has stated as to how to best present >this material. > >Best regards, >Greg > >==================== >Greg Hupe >The Hupe Collection >NaturesVault (eBay) >gmhupe_at_tampabay.rr.com >IMCA 3163 >==================== > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "E.P. Grondine" <epgrondine_at_yahoo.com> >To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com> >Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 1:58 PM >Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Further precision re "Bessey Specks" > > >> Hi all - >> >> We're ignoring the important issues of display and >> presentation here. >> >> I seem to remember that Dean had imbedded the specks >> in $100 lucite cubes. Way too expensive for young >> people, who sometimes loose things. >> >> While the little glass tubes that Greg Hupe used will >> fit well in little hands, I am worried about the >> glass, which limits the age of the recipient. >> >> I seem to remember little plastic boxes with >> magnifying lenses built into the top of them, but I >> don't think these would be very elegant/pretty, and >> the tubes are better. >> >> Some kind of flat embossed plastic holder with a >> magnifier molded into it might be ideal, say a blank >> one on which labels could be printed on a computer and >> then applied. >> >> What kind of presentation do you think would be ideal >> for Bessey Specks? >> >> There's a lot of lunar and martian dust being created >> by slicing NWAs, and it might as well be put to a very >> good use. >> >> good hunting, >> Ed >> >> --- tracy latimer <daistiho_at_hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> For myself, I've always considered a Bessey Speck to >>> be anything smaller >>> than a match head or grain of rice. Adequate to >>> fill in a space in a >>> collection where larger samples are unavailable or >>> prohibitively expensive, >>> but no good for seeing lithologies without a >>> microscope or 10x lens, >>> minimum. >>> >>> Tracy Latimer >>> >>> >From: Michael L Blood <mlblood_at_cox.net> >>> >To: MexicoDoug <MexicoDoug_at_aim.com>,Adam Hupe >>> <raremeteorites_at_comcast.net> >>> >CC: Meteorite List >>> <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com> >>> >Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Further precision re >>> "Bessey Specks" >>> >Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:25:43 -0700 >>> > >>> >Doug and all, >>> > This is closer - but to be truly a "Bessey >>> Speck" a specimen >>> >must be small enough to VERY, VERY EASILY fit in >>> the smallest >>> >sized gelatin capsule (they come in a variety of >>> sizes) and should >>> >be difficult or nearly difficult to see for anyone >>> with less than 20/20 >>> >vision. Also referred to as a "Micro-mini" to >>> differentiate from what Adam >>> >referred to as a "micromount" which can be as large >>> as 1" X 1" ! >>> >"Micromount" is well established as fitting in a 1 >>> X 1 - though this >>> >has been "challenged" with the considerably larger, >>> yet still small >>> >membrane boxes, which I am sure many would consider >>> "micromount" >>> >as opposed to "macromount" which are ROUGHLY those >>> that would >>> >fit in a 2" X 2" box. >>> > Back to Bessey Speck - it MUST be VERY >>> small to qualify, >>> >and certainly MUCH, MUCH smaller than 1" X 1" ! >>> > I regret I must run off to teaching a >>> couple of classes - this is >>> >much more interesting to me than arguments. >>> > Michael >>> > >>> > >>> >on 10/17/06 12:58 PM, MexicoDoug at >>> MexicoDoug_at_aim.com wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hello Adam, Listees, >>> > > >>> > > Bessey Speck >>> > > (1) A commercially marketed, >>> submillimeter-sized, granular or >>> >irregular, >>> > > intentionally broken petreus meteoritical >>> fragment which collectors >>> >prize as >>> > > a token possession of an expensive meteorite or >>> of one with limited >>> > > distribution, typically used more as a >>> conversational piece or to >>> > > satisfactorily fill a primal participatatory >>> instinct for collection and >>> > > coat-tailing on the "wow-effect" of possession >>> of the parent specimen. >>> > > Compare to "Particle", "Stardust", "Crumb", >>> "Micro" and "Micromount". >>> > > (2) Any, almost microscopic-sized particle >>> originating from a larger >>> >(macro) >>> > > meteorite specimen. >>> > > >>> > > Note, I'm not disagreeing with Adam' response to >>> Ed in the sense that >>> >the >>> > > term micromount is a term in the toolbox, >>> although I think the word >>> >particle >>> > > is more descriptive for most of our uses. I am >>> agreeing with Michael >>> >Blood >>> > > that the term Bessey Speck has a place. >>> > > >>> > > The questionably honorific term "Bessey Speck" >>> seems like a much more >>> > > descriptive term to me than micromount for many >>> collectors. To me a >>> > > "micromount" implies some sort of serious grand >>> plan of scientific >>> > > investigation or illustration of specific >>> attributes. Size alone >>> >doesn't >>> > > count, as much as purpose. For example, >>> Stardust particles are not >>> > > micromounts unless prepared that way despite >>> Adam's definition, and they >>> >are >>> > > not Bessey Specks, though micro-Besseyspeckies >>> are certainly >>> >hypothetically >>> > > possible. >>> > > >>> > > "Bessey Speck" consideres that not all particles >>> commercially sold in >>> >venues >>> > > like eBay find scientific use regardless of who >>> is doing the selling. >>> >That's >>> > > where Bessey Speck is a unique and interesting >>> term. Adam's definition >>> > > clearly has the weighted meaning toward a >>> usually higher "scientific" >>> >use in >>> > > observing material properties: appreciation with >>> binocular microscope, >>> > > better developed crystals, etc... The short >>> comment in that definition >>> > > "obtaining for less," especially given the >>> profit and pleasure motives >>> > > between buyers and sellers, really seems quite >>> out of place to me. >>> >Adam's >>> > > post wasn't clear, at least for me, if he >>> disagreed with the use of the >>> >term >>> > > Bessey Speck or just was offering Ed an >>> alternate (which I definitely >>> >agree >>> > > with Adam in doing). >>> > > >>> > > I am not comfortable with the term micromount >>> being more properly used >>> >for >>> > > specimens purposefully shattered into small bits >>> with a sledge for the >>> > > unadulterated and pure pleasure of collectors >>> filling holes in their >>> > > collections, a majority of which are not "better >>> appreciating" their >>> >samples >>> > > in a binocular microscope which many don't have >>> nor have too much >>> >motivation >>> > > to get. >>> > > >>> > > Didn't "Bessey Speck" usage start with Dean's >>> Mars rock sales many years >>> > > before most of our times? I am trying to >>> remember Kevin Kitchinka's >>> > > comments in "The Art of Meteorite Collecting" >>> (don't have handy here) >>> >where >>> > > an explanation of the etymology of this colorful >>> term was published and >>> >my >>> > > Mars' comment references. Bessey Specks, >>> though, gets the point across >>> >much >>> > > better for me! It's ll in the intended use and >>> market. While I don' >>> >think >>> > > a "Micromount" is an appropiate common sense >>> description for something >>> >not >>> > > carefully prepared and mounted to exhibit some >>> characteristic, heck - if >>> > > their not even carefully mounted... >>> > > >>> > > So, unless Dean objects to being immortalized in >>> this fashion, that is >>> >my 2 >>> > > centavos. >>> > > Doug >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > ----- Original Message ----- >>> > > From: "Adam Hupe" <raremeteorites_at_comcast.net> >>> > > To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com> >>> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 2:53 PM >>> > > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Re: "Bessey >>> Specks" >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > The term micromount has been used for decades to >>> describe this type of >>> > > specimen. >>> > > >>> > > Micromount: >>> > > >>> > > Micromount is term used by mineral collectors >>> and rockhounds to describe >>> > > mineral specimens that are best appreciated >>> using a binocular >>> >microscope. >>> > > Micromount specimen collecting has a number of >>> advantages, specimens >>> >take up >>> > > less space, rare minerals can be obtained for >>> less and smaller crystals >>> >are >>> > > more perfectly developed. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > All the best, >>> > > >>> > > Adam >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > ----- Original Message ----- >>> > > From: "E.P. Grondine" <epgrondine_at_yahoo.com> >>> > > To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com> >>> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 7:07 AM >>> > > Subject: [meteorite-list] Re: "Bessey Specks" >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >> Hi Michael, list - >>> > >> >>> > >> I see you list your Bessey Specks as "frags". >>> > >> >>> > >> (Your price of $25 seems very fair for Nakla >>> specks, >>> > >> but I already picked up Mars Bessey Specks for >>> > >> childrens' gifts at Christmas from Hupe.) >>> > >> >>> > >> Clearly, there is a need for a more elegant >>> term than >>> > >> "Bessey Specks" for these. Does anybody have >>> any >>> > >> proposals? If not, is Dean(?-stroke damage) >>> Bessey >>> > >> going to be immortalized by having these >>> formally >>> > >> named after him? >>> > >> >>> > >> Hupe also sent the Bessey specks in small tubes >>> > >> suitable for young hands, along with 1 nice >>> pair of >>> > >> cards (BTW I need a second pair of cards for >>> the >>> > >> second set of tubes, Greg), instead of gelatin >>> > >> capsules. >>> > >> >>> > >> Perhaps microscope slides would be more >>> suitable for >>> > >> adult use, but as I don't remember any >>> discussion of >>> > >> these on the list, I'm bringing it up now. >>> > >> >>> > >> good hunting - >>> > >> Ed >>> > >> >>> > >> --- Michael L Blood <mlblood_at_cox.net> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >>> Greetings fellow space treasure lovers, >>> > >>> This post includes a fabulous, large >>> iron >>> > >>> and an entire new >>> > >>> page of historic calls. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> FIRST: >>> > >>> A beautiful 6.5 Kg / 14.3 Lb S-A Shrapnel >>> piece that >>> > >>> appears for all >>> > >>> the world to be an oriented shield on one side >>> and a >>> > >>> flat, oriented >>> > >>> specimen heading to the left in a downward >>> angle on >>> > >>> the other side. >>> > >>> This piece includes an custom build >>> display >>> > >>> stand to facilitate >>> > >>> a very impressive display of its virtues. >>> > >>> If no one snaps this up on sale it >>> will go >>> > >>> into my catalog >>> > >>> at $3,250- but the first to contact me will >>> take it >>> > >>> in this sale for 2,750- >>> > >>> (price includes shipping and insurance inside >>> the >>> > >>> US) >>> > >>> This spectacular piece can be seen >>> at: >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> http://community.webshots.com/album/554884324rEfSPa >>> > >>> >>> > >>> SECOND: >>> > >>> I have set up an entire page dedicated to >>> hammers ? >>> > >>> meteorites that have >>> > >>> struck man made objects, animals or humans. >>> This is >>> > >>> a collection of the >>> > >>> most impressive of all the recorded meteorite >>> falls >>> > >>> in history. I have 35 >>> > >>> different recorded falls (including Bessey >>> Specks of >>> > >>> Sylacauga, Yurtuk and >>> > >>> Burnwell). About half of the falls can also be >>> found >>> > >>> elsewhere with diligent >>> > >>> searching ? and you will find my prices are as >>> low >>> > >>> as anyone's. The others >>> > >>> cannot be had anywhere else. They are priced >>> > >>> according to cost. This page >>> > >>> is >>> > >>> worth checking out even if you don't want to >>> buy >>> > >>> anything ? it was 5 years >>> > >>> in the making and includes historical photos, >>> links, >>> > >>> etc. See at the URL >>> > >>> below: >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> http://www.michaelbloodmeteorites.com/Hammers.html >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Pieces on the Hammer page will be marked >>> "SOLD" as >>> > >>> orders come in ? >>> > >>> so, if it is still listed when you email me, >>> it is >>> > >>> available. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> PayPal preferred (sent to this email >>> > >>> address) Visa/Mastercard >>> > >>> and personal checks gladly accepted. >>> > >>> Happy Hunting! Michael >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> __________________________________________________ >>> > >> Do You Yahoo!? >>> > >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam >>> protection around >>> > >> http://mail.yahoo.com >>> > >> ______________________________________________ >>> > >> Meteorite-list mailing list >>> > >> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com >>> > >> >>> >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > ______________________________________________ >>> > > Meteorite-list mailing list >>> > > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com >>> > > >>> >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > ______________________________________________ >>> > > Meteorite-list mailing list >>> > > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com >>> > > >>> >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >>> > >>> >-- >>> >Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any >>> more than >>> >standing in a garage makes you a car. >>> >-- >>> >"Is our children learning?" >>> >"I know the human being and fish can coexist >>> peacefully." >>> >"More and more of our imports come from overseas." >>> >"The very act of spending money can be expensive." >>> > George W. Bush >>> >-- >>> >Blind Faith in bad leadership is NOT Patriotism >>> >-- >>> >"Dissent is the highest form of Patriotism." >>> > Thomas Jefferson >>> >-- >>> >What if the hokey pokey is really what it's all >>> about? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >______________________________________________ >>> >Meteorite-list mailing list >>> >Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com >>> >>>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >>> >>> >> _________________________________________________________________ >>> Use your PC to make calls at very low rates >>> >> https://voiceoam.pcs.v2s.live.com/partnerredirect.aspx >>> >>> ______________________________________________ >>> Meteorite-list mailing list >>> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com >>> >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >>> >> >> >> __________________________________________________ >> Do You Yahoo!? >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >> http://mail.yahoo.com >> ______________________________________________ >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >> > > >______________________________________________ >Meteorite-list mailing list >Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com >http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > >______________________________________________ >Meteorite-list mailing list >Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com >http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Wed 18 Oct 2006 05:12:51 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |